[2008] KEHC 2187 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2187 (KLR)

The court found that the Mwea Irrigation Scheme Advisory Committee is not a statutory body established with judicial or quasi-judicial powers. Its role is purely advisory, and the Board is empowered to act on its advice. As such, the Committee is not amenable to judicial review. The preliminary objection was upheld...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2187 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinuthia Karogo; Respondent: Mwea Irrigation Scheme Advisory Committee; Respondent: Francis Kamotho Karago
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 16 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Amenability of Bodies, Statutory Bodies, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Amenability of Bodies Statutory Bodies Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinuthia Karogo

Applicant

Mwea Irrigation Scheme Advisory Committee

Respondent

Francis Kamotho Karago

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Mwea Irrigation Scheme Advisory Committee is amenable to judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the Advisory Committee exercises judicial or quasi-judicial powers.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Mwea Irrigation Scheme Advisory Committee is not a statutory body established with judicial or quasi-judicial powers. Its role is purely advisory, and the Board is empowered to act on its advice. As such, the Committee is not amenable to judicial review. The preliminary objection was upheld and the application was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is upheld.
  • The application is dismissed with costs.