[2025] KEHC 9816 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 9816 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided valid certificates of taxation for the consolidated matters, that there was no dispute as to the retainer or the amounts certified, and that the respondent had not opposed the application. Relying on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 9816 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates; Respondent: African Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Naivasha
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application E014 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Consolidation
Outcome
Application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for the taxed sums; matters consolidated; interest and costs awarded.
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Judgment on Certificates, Consolidation of Matters
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Remuneration Judgment on Certificates Consolidation of Matters

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates

Applicant

African Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Consolidation

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificates of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the matters should be consolidated as sought by the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided valid certificates of taxation for the consolidated matters, that there was no dispute as to the retainer or the amounts certified, and that the respondent had not opposed the application. Relying on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the certificates of taxation are final as to the amounts due unless set aside or altered, and since there was no such challenge, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the sums certified. The court also found it appropriate to consolidate the matters as sought and awarded interest from the date of each certificate of taxation, as well as the costs of the application to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for the taxed sums; matters consolidated; interest and costs awarded.

Orders

  • The matters Naivasha HC Misc Application Nos. E014, E036, E037, E039, and E040 of 2025 are consolidated.
  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs 901,625 as per the certificates of taxation.