[2025] KEHC 9309 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had produced valid certificates of taxation for all consolidated matters, totaling Kshs 1,018,879.50, and that the respondent had not disputed the retainer, the taxed sums, or sought to set aside the certificates. The application was unopposed as the respondent failed to respond...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 9309 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates; Respondent: Corporate Insurance Co Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E149 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Consolidation
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the applicant for the total taxed costs; interest to accrue from date of service of the applications; costs awarded to the applicant.
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Judgment on Certificates of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates
Applicant
Corporate Insurance Co Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Consolidation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificates of taxation.
- 2 Whether interest should be awarded on the taxed sums and from what date.
- 3 Whether the respondent was properly served and given an opportunity to oppose the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had produced valid certificates of taxation for all consolidated matters, totaling Kshs 1,018,879.50, and that the respondent had not disputed the retainer, the taxed sums, or sought to set aside the certificates. The application was unopposed as the respondent failed to respond despite service. The court held that judgment should be entered for the applicant for the full taxed amount. On the issue of interest, the court determined that there was no evidence of demand for the taxed sums after taxation, and therefore interest would only accrue from the date of service of the respective applications upon the respondent, not from the earlier date claimed by...
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the applicant for the total taxed costs; interest to accrue from date of service of the applications; costs awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant in the sum of Kshs 1,018,879.50.
- Interest to accrue from the date of service of the respective applications upon the respondent until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates v Corporate Insurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E149 of 2024 & Civil Miscellaneous Application E112, E116, E139 & E144 of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEHC 9309 (KLR) (27 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 9309 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Naivasha
Miscellaneous Application E149 of 2024 & Civil Miscellaneous Application E112, E116, E139 & E144 of 2024 (Consolidated)
GL Nzioka, J
June 27, 2025
Between
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates
Applicant
and
Corporate Insurance Co ltd
Respondent
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion application dated 9th June 2025, brought under the provisions of Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, section 51(2) of the Advocates Act (Cap 16) Laws of Kenya, Order 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order (Under section 48) of the Advocates Act (Cap 16) Laws of Kenya and the applicant is seeking for the following orders: -a.That the Honourable court be pleased consolidate the instant matter with, Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E116 OF 2024 Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E112 OF 2024 Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E139 OF 2024 Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E107 OF 2024 Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E144 OF 2024b.That pursuant to prayer 1 above the Honourable court be pleased to enter judgment/decree for Kshs. 1,018,879. 5 tabulated as hereunder;Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E149 OF 2024 Kshs 88,100Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E116 OF 2024 Kshs 49,919Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E112 OF 2024 Kshs 259,433. 5Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E139 OF 2024 Kshs 244,060Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E107 OF 2024 Kshs 122,995Naivasha HC Misc Application No. E144 OF 2024 Kshs 254,372c.That the interest be provided for at 14% per annum from 03/06/2022 until payment in full.d.That the cost of the application be awarded to the applicant.
2. The application is supported by the grounds thereto and an affidavit of the even date, sworn by Kinyanjui Theuri an Advocate of the High Court practicing in the applicant’s firm.
3. He avers that, certificates of taxation have been issued in respect of the amount claimed and the same annexed to the affidavit in support of this application. However, the respondent has continually failed to pay the legal fees despite demand and notice thereof.
4. That the applicant is entitled to the fees duly earned in the course of service in line with the Advocates Remuneration Order. Further, the respondent does not dispute the taxed sums and that the application is made in the sole interest of justice and should be allowed as prayed.
5. Upon considering the application, the court ordered that, it be served for hearing inter parties hearing. The respondent was served but did not file a response to the application. Consequently, the application is deemed to be unopposed.
6. Be that as it were, I note that, the applicant has availed all the certificates of taxation, in relation to all the consolidated matters totaling a sum of Kshs 1,018,879. 50. I also note that there is no dispute herein on retainer and neither have the subject certificates of taxation been varied or set aside.
7. As a result, I enter judgment in favour of the applicant in the sum of Kshs 1,018,879. 50 as prayed.
8. As regards interest, I note that the bills of costs were filed, taxed, and certificates of taxation issued between the months of December 2024 to March 2025. Apparently amended certificates of taxation were signed as late as in the month of June 2025.
9. Similarly, the letters that, the applicant is referring to as having notified the respondent of the taxed amount are actually letters that were sent after judgment was entered in the primary suits in the trial court and before taxation.
10. It is the considered opinion of this court that, no letter has been availed to prove demand of the taxed sum after taxation. Consequently, interest on the sum awarded herein will accrue from the date of service of the respective applications herein upon the respondent, especially taking into account that the ruling of the taxation was delivered in the absence of the respondent.
11. It is so ordered
DATED, DELIVERED, AND SIGNED ON THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2025GRACE L. NZIOKAJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Mabeya for the applicantN/A for the respondentMs. Hannah: court assistant