[2023] KEHC 21339 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had produced valid certificates of taxation for the respective matters, which had not been set aside or varied, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. Therefore, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sums, except for the amount in Naivasha Miscellaneous...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21339 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E056 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part.
- Judges
- GL Nzioka
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Judgment on Certificates of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates
Applicant
Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should consolidate the listed miscellaneous applications involving the same parties and similar claims for legal fees.
- 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the applicant based on the certificates of taxation issued in the respective files.
- 3 Whether interest at 14% per annum is payable from the date claimed by the applicant or from the date of service of the certificates of taxation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had produced valid certificates of taxation for the respective matters, which had not been set aside or varied, and there was no dispute as to the retainer. Therefore, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the certified sums, except for the amount in Naivasha Miscellaneous Application No. 73 of 2019, which had already been dealt with in another matter. The total amount allowed was Kshs. 274,977. As for interest, the court held that it is only payable from the date of service of the certificates of taxation upon the respondent, not from the earlier date claimed by the applicant, and at court rates subject to proof. The costs of the application were...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part.
Orders
- The matters are consolidated as prayed, excluding Naivasha Miscellaneous Application No. 73 of 2019.
- Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs. 274,977 as per the certificates of taxation, excluding the amount in Naivasha Miscellaneous Application No. 73 of 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates v Invesco Assurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application E056, E057, E058 & E059 of 2021 & 73, 74 & 85 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEHC 21339 (KLR) (9 August 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21339 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Naivasha
Miscellaneous Civil Application E056, E057, E058 & E059 of 2021 & 73, 74 & 85 of 2019 (Consolidated)
GL Nzioka, J
August 9, 2023
Between
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co Advocates
Applicant
and
Invesco Assurance Company Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion application dated 9th September 2022, brought under the provisions of Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 section 48 and 51(2) of the Advocates Act, and Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, the applicant is seeking for the following orders: -a.That the Honourable court be pleased to consolidate the instant matter with: -i.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. E056 of 2021ii.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. E057 of 2021iii.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. E058 of 2021iv.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. E059 of 2021v.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 73 of 2019vi.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 74 of 2019vii.Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 85 of 2019b.That pursuant to prayer 1 above the Honourable court be pleased to enter judgment/decree for Kshs 327,669 tabulated as hereunder;i.Naivasha misc. application No. E056 of 2021: Kshs 37,326ii.Naivasha misc. application No. E057of 2021: Kshs 42,595iii.Naivasha misc. application No. E058 of 2021: Kshs 44,119iv.Naivasha misc. application No. E059 of 2021: Kshs 44,119v.Naivasha misc. application No. 73 of 2019: Kshs 52,692vi.Naivasha misc. application No. 74 of 2019: Kshs 52,692vii.Naivasha misc. application No. 85 of 2019: Kshs 54,126Total KSHS 327,669c.That interest be provided for at 14% per annum from 27/03/2018 until payment in full.d.That the cost of the application be awarded to applicant
2. The application is supported by the grounds on the face of it and an affidavit sworn by Kinyanjui Theuri an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya and partner in the applicant’s firm. He deposes that, the subject matters relate to the same parties and involve similar claims for legal fees and therefore consolidation in necessary for expeditious disposal.
3. That, the applicant’s bills of costs in the matters have been taxed and certificates of taxation drawn, signed and issued. Further, although the respondent does not dispute the fact that the fees, claimed is due and payable, it has continuously failed to pay the same despite demand and notice.
4. That, an advocate is legally entitled to fees earned in the course of his services in line with the Advocates Remuneration Order. Thus, the instant application is made in the sole interest and due realization of the legal fees earned.
5. Furthermore, interest is payable at fourteen percent (14%) per annum from the date of demand and service of notice to settle the legal fees. That, if the court fails to grant the orders sought, the applicant will be prejudiced as the respondent is facing liquidity challenges.
6. Upon considering the application, the court ordered that, the same be served for directions inter parties on; 25th July 2023. On the material date, Ms. Onyango holding brief for the applicant appeared in court and informed the court that it had served the respondent but unfortunately the applicant had not filed an affidavit of service. The court set the matter for hearing on 2nd August 2023 and directed the respondent to be served.
7. However, when the matter came up for hearing on 2nd August 2023, the respondent was not in court, despite having been served as evidenced by an affidavit of service dated; 26th July 2023 served by Brian Kiptoo, the process server. In that case the application was heard unopposed.
8. Be that as it were, I have considered the application in the light of the materials availed in support thereof. I note that the applicable is stipulated under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, (Cap 16) Laws of Kenya, which states that: -“The certificate of a taxing officer by whom it has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of costs covered thereby, and the court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgment be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs.”
9. In that regard I note that the applicant has produced evidence of the certificates of taxation issued in the respective files all dated; 9th September 2022.
10. It is also noteworthy that the respective certificates of taxation have not been set aside nor varied and neither is there a there a dispute on retainer in the respective matter, therefore there is no justification to decline to issue orders as prayed for in prayers (1) and (2).
11. However, I note that Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 73 of 2019 was included and dealt with in Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 81 of 2019. Hence the orders herein shall exclude the amount Kshs. 52,692 due in Naivasha miscellaneous application No. 73 of 2019, therefore the amount due herein is Kshs. 274,977 and that ias what is allowed under prayer (2) of the application.
12. As regards prayer (3) on interest, it suffices to note that the provisions of section 51 (2) do not provide for interest. However, Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order provides that: -An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.
13. However, I note that the certificates of taxation were issued on the 9th September 2022. The applicant can only get interest from the date of service of the same upon the respondent and not the year claimed herein. Therefore, interest is payable from the aforesaid dates at court rates and subject to proof thereof. The costs of this application is awarded to the applicant.
14. It is so ordered.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED ON THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023. GRACE L. NZIOKAJUDGEIn the presence of;Mr. Khisa for the applicantMs. Kagena H/B for Ms Marasi for the respondentMs. Ogutu court assistant