[2020] KEHC 10346 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's bills of costs in the referenced matters had been taxed, certificates of taxation issued, and that the respondent had not filed any response or objection despite being duly served. The court was satisfied that the application was merited, the respondent had failed to pay the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 10346 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 93 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed as prayed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the consolidated taxed costs, with interest and costs awarded.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Judgment Entry, Consolidation of Matters
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kinyanjui Njuguna & Co. Advocates
Applicant
Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Consolidation and Entry of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to consolidation of the listed miscellaneous applications.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as prayed.
- 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's bills of costs in the referenced matters had been taxed, certificates of taxation issued, and that the respondent had not filed any response or objection despite being duly served. The court was satisfied that the application was merited, the respondent had failed to pay the legal fees due, and there was no dispute as to the amounts claimed. In the absence of opposition and in light of the applicant's entitlement under the Advocates Remuneration Order and the Advocates Act, the court allowed the application as prayed, granting consolidation, entry of judgment for the taxed sums, interest, and costs.
Court Disposition
Application allowed as prayed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the consolidated taxed costs, with interest and costs awarded.
Orders
- The instant matter is consolidated with Milimani Miscellaneous Application Nos. 94, 96, 143, and 146 of 2019.
- Judgment is entered for the applicant for KES 1,829,062 as tabulated in the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2019
KINYANJUI NJUGUNA & CO. ADVOCATES.............ADVOCATE/APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
KENYA ORIENT INSURANCE CO. LTD........................CLIENT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Through the application dated 5th March 2020 the applicant seeks the following orders: -
1. That the honourable court be pleased to consolidate the instant matter with:
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No. 94 of 2019
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No. 96 of 2019
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No. 143 of 2019
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No. 146 of 2019
2. That pursuant to prayer 1, the honourable court be pleased to enter judgment above for Kshs 1,829,062/- tabulated as hereunder: -
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No. 94 of 2019 ksh 434,531
Milimani Miscellaneous Application No.96 of 2019 kshs 433,671
Milimani Misc. Application No. 143 of 2019 kshs 375,531
Milimani Misc. Application No. 146 of 2019 kshs 585,329
Total = 1,829,062/-
3. That interest be provided for at 14% per annum from 4th September 2017 untill payment in full.
4. That the cost of the application be provided be awarded to applicant.
2. The application is supported by the advocates affidavit dated 5th March 2020 and is premised on the grounds that: -
1. That the applicant’s bill of costs in the above captioned matter has since been taxed.
2. That the respondent never filed any response to the said bill of costs notwithstanding service.
3. That pursuant to paragraph 1 herein certificate of taxation has since been drawn signed and issued.
4. That the respondent has continually neglected and/or failed to pay legal fees duly earned despite demand and notice by the applicant.
5. That the respondent is facing a liquidity crisis and the recovery of funds is in jeopardy.
6. That the instant application is necessitated by the fact, the financial liquidity of the respondent is unknown vis-à-vis in question.
7. That an advocate is legally entitled to fees duly earned in the course of service line with the advocate Remuneration order.
8. That the respondent does not dispute the fees.
9. That the instant application is made in the sole interest of justice and in due realization of legal fees earned by the applicant.
10. That if the court fails to grant the orders sought herein the applicant is likely to suffer gross prejudice, as the financial liquidity of the respondent is in question.
11. That the applicant is entitled to the judgment/decree/interest.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 22nd October 2020, Mr. Onyango for the applicant intimated to the court that the application was not opposed as the respondent had not filed any response despite proper service. He thus urged the court to allow the application as prayed.
4. I have perused the application together with the supporting affidavit and I am satisfied that it is merited.
5. A perusal of the affidavit of service dated 15th September 2020 also indicates that the respondent was duly served with the application.
6. Consequently, I allow the application dated 5th March 2020 as prayed.
Dated, signed and delivered via Microsoft Teams at Nairobi this 26th day of November 2020in view of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to Covid -19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on the 17th April 2020.
W. A. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Muturi for Onyango for applicant
No appearance for respondent
Court Assistant: Sylvia