[2019] KEHC 4944 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 4944 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained certificates of taxation in 33 matters, which were duly served on the respondent. The respondent was also properly served with the application and hearing notice but failed to oppose the application. The court was satisfied that the application was properly grounded in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 4944 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinyanjui Njuguna & Company Advocates; Respondent: Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 329 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed
Judges
JK Mulwa
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bills, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bills Certificate of Taxation Judgment Entry

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinyanjui Njuguna & Company Advocates

Applicant

Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum certified in the certificates of taxation for 33 matters.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was properly served with the application and hearing notice.
  3. 3 Whether the application is properly grounded in law and unopposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained certificates of taxation in 33 matters, which were duly served on the respondent. The respondent was also properly served with the application and hearing notice but failed to oppose the application. The court was satisfied that the application was properly grounded in law, specifically under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Order 50 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In the absence of any opposition and upon confirmation of the certificates of taxation, the court allowed the application and entered judgment for the sum certified, together with costs and interest as prayed.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed

Orders

  • The 32 applications are consolidated with the present application.
  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs. 7,058,452 being the sum total of the certificates of taxation in the 33 matters.