[2023] KECPT 848 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 848 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant produced receipts showing payment of Kshs 200,000, the receipts specifically referenced Hilltop Cottages, not the Mavuno Investment or Heritage Investment products as claimed. The Claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence linking the payments to the alleged...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 848 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kelvin Wainaina Kinyanjui; Respondent: Urithi Housing Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 184 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Investment Disputes, Cooperative Societies, Burden of Proof, Contractual Refunds
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Investment Disputes Cooperative Societies Burden of Proof Contractual Refunds

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kelvin Wainaina Kinyanjui

Applicant

Urithi Housing Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent owes the money claimed by the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant proved his case on a balance of probabilities.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant produced receipts showing payment of Kshs 200,000, the receipts specifically referenced Hilltop Cottages, not the Mavuno Investment or Heritage Investment products as claimed. The Claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence linking the payments to the alleged investments. Applying the burden of proof principle, the Tribunal held that the Claimant did not prove his case on a balance of probabilities. Consequently, the claim was dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The statement of claim is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.