[2025] KEHC 588 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 588 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid decree against the respondent, which remained unsatisfied. The garnishee, Safaricom Limited, confirmed that the respondent's Mpesa Pay Bill account held sufficient funds to satisfy the decretal sum and costs. The garnishee did not object to the order being made...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 588 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinyua & Maingi Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Co. Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E336 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Garnishee Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
PN Gichohi
Legal Topics
Garnishee Proceedings, Enforcement of Decrees, Attachment of Funds
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Garnishee Proceedings Enforcement of Decrees Attachment of Funds

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinyua & Maingi Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Co. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Garnishee Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a garnishee order absolute to attach funds held by the garnishee on behalf of the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's account with the garnishee contains sufficient funds to satisfy the decree.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the garnishee proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained a valid decree against the respondent, which remained unsatisfied. The garnishee, Safaricom Limited, confirmed that the respondent's Mpesa Pay Bill account held sufficient funds to satisfy the decretal sum and costs. The garnishee did not object to the order being made absolute and undertook to release the funds upon service of the order. The respondent, despite being duly served, failed to respond or attend the proceedings. In these circumstances, the court held that the applicant was entitled to a garnishee order absolute, directing the garnishee to release the sum of Kshs. 148,880 to the applicant. The court further ordered that the costs...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Garnishee Order Nisi issued on 10th January 2025 is made absolute.
  • The Garnishee Order Absolute shall be served on the garnishee to release the sum of Kshs. 148,880 to the applicant forthwith.