[2025] KEHC 16864 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 16864 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had obtained certificates of taxation for costs in each of the consolidated matters, and that the respondent, despite being duly served, had neither challenged the certificates nor filed any response or submissions. Applying Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 16864 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinyua & Maingi Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E304 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs in each matter; costs of the applications awarded to the applicant.
Judges
JWW Mong'are
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Entry of Judgment, Advocate Client Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Entry of Judgment Advocate Client Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinyua & Maingi Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to entry of judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's failure to respond or file submissions affects the outcome of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had obtained certificates of taxation for costs in each of the consolidated matters, and that the respondent, despite being duly served, had neither challenged the certificates nor filed any response or submissions. Applying Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the advocate is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs where the certificate of taxation has not been set aside or altered. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the applicant for the respective taxed amounts in each matter, with costs of the applications also awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs in each matter; costs of the applications awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs. 72,358 in Misc Appl. No. E304 of 2023.
  • Judgment is entered for the applicant for Kshs. 179,836 in Misc Appl. No. E305 of 2023.