[2025] KEHC 6856 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 6856 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and certified by a valid certificate of taxation, and that the respondent had neither disputed the retainer nor challenged the certificate. In the absence of any substantive response or objection from the respondent, and pursuant to section 51(2) of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 6856 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kinyua & Maingi Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Murang'a
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E009 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs and costs of the application
Judges
TW Ouya
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Judgment Entry

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kinyua & Maingi Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the certified taxed costs against the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has disputed the retainer or the amount certified in the certificate of taxation.
  3. 3 Whether the court should grant judgment as prayed together with costs and interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's costs had been taxed and certified by a valid certificate of taxation, and that the respondent had neither disputed the retainer nor challenged the certificate. In the absence of any substantive response or objection from the respondent, and pursuant to section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that the certificate of taxation is final as to the amount due. The court therefore granted judgment in favour of the applicant for the certified sum, together with costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs and costs of the application

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 65,240 being the certified taxed costs.
  • The respondent shall pay the applicant the costs of this application.