[2024] KECA 1364 (KLR)

[2024] KECA 1364 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having obtained a limited grant of representation, was entitled to be substituted as the 1st appellant in place of the deceased. The court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been shown for the extension of time to make the application for substitution, given the circumstances...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECA 1364 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Wamuyu Kinyua (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Joseph Kinyua Mukiri - Deceased); Applicant: Christopher Gathua Mukiri; Respondent: Edith Wangari Waduna
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 180 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Substitute Deceased Appellant and Revive Abated Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Time extended for substitution. Appeal revived. Applicant substituted as appellant. Costs to abide the appeal.
Judges
S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Substitution of Parties, Abatement of Appeal, Revival of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Substitution of Parties Abatement of Appeal Revival of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Wamuyu Kinyua (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Joseph Kinyua Mukiri - Deceased)

Applicant

Christopher Gathua Mukiri

Applicant

Edith Wangari Waduna

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Substitute Deceased Appellant and Revive Abated Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should extend time to allow substitution of the deceased appellant with the legal representative.
  2. 2 Whether the abated appeal should be revived to allow prosecution by the legal representative.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having obtained a limited grant of representation, was entitled to be substituted as the 1st appellant in place of the deceased. The court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been shown for the extension of time to make the application for substitution, given the circumstances of the death and the timing of the grant. The appeal, which had abated due to the lapse of more than one year since the death of the original appellant, was revived to allow the applicant to prosecute it on merit. The court exercised its discretion under the relevant rules to ensure that the interests of justice were served, allowing the substitution and revival of the appeal....

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Time extended for substitution. Appeal revived. Applicant substituted as appellant. Costs to abide the appeal.

Orders

  • Time for making the application for substitution is extended.
  • The appeal is revived.