[2024] KECPT 1685 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1685 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that since the claimant withdrew the matter with costs and did not contest the respondent's bill of costs, the bill should be taxed in accordance with the Advocate Remuneration Order Schedule II. The Tribunal assessed the items claimed, allowing Kshs. 35,280 for the defence of a matter that cannot...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1685 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Karimi Kinyua; Respondent: Bingwa Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited & others
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 49/E081 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Bill of Costs / Taxation Ruling After Withdrawal of Claim
Outcome
bill of costs taxed and allowed in part
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Costs Taxation, Withdrawal of Suit, Advocate Remuneration Order
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Costs Taxation Withdrawal of Suit Advocate Remuneration Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Karimi Kinyua

Applicant

Bingwa Savings and Credit Cooperative Limited & others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Bill of Costs / Taxation Ruling After Withdrawal of Claim

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's bill of costs should be taxed as presented after withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate amount to be awarded under the Advocate Remuneration Order Schedule II.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that since the claimant withdrew the matter with costs and did not contest the respondent's bill of costs, the bill should be taxed in accordance with the Advocate Remuneration Order Schedule II. The Tribunal assessed the items claimed, allowing Kshs. 35,280 for the defence of a matter that cannot be ascertained and Kshs. 1,400 for item 4, while items 2, 3, and 5 were taxed at nil. The total taxed costs awarded to the respondent amounted to Kshs. 36,680.

Court Disposition

bill of costs taxed and allowed in part

Orders

  • The respondent's bill of costs is taxed and allowed at Kshs. 36,680.
  • Items 2, 3, and 5 of the bill of costs are taxed at nil.