[2023] KEHC 17956 (KLR)
The court found that the application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. However, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the criminal revision process, the court directed that the lower court file be typed and certified copies of the proceedings and order be availed by a specified date....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17956 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Silvia Mueni Kioo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E324 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for urgency declined; directions issued for further conduct of criminal revision.
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Revision Procedure, Urgency Certification, Court Directions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silvia Mueni Kioo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be certified as urgent.
- 2 Whether directions should be given for the typing and availing of lower court proceedings.
- 3 Whether timelines for service and response should be set.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. However, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the criminal revision process, the court directed that the lower court file be typed and certified copies of the proceedings and order be availed by a specified date. The court further ordered that the matter be mentioned for directions and set clear timelines for service of the order on the respondent and for the respondent to file a response. These directions ensure procedural fairness and efficient case management.
Court Disposition
Application for urgency declined; directions issued for further conduct of criminal revision.
Orders
- This matter is not certified urgent.
- The lower court file to be typed and a certified copy of the proceedings and order to be availed on June 7, 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Kioo v Republic (Criminal Revision E324 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 17956 (KLR) (Crim) (24 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17956 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Criminal
Criminal Revision E324 of 2023
DR Kavedza, J
May 24, 2023
Between
Silvia Mueni Kioo
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. I have gone through the Notice of Motion application dated May 16, 2023 filed under Certificate of Urgency and the supporting affidavit of Sylvia Mueni Kioo sworn on the same date and issue the following orders:-a)This matter is not certified urgent.b)The lower court file to be typed and a certified copy of the proceedings and order to be availed on June 7, 2023. c)Matter be mentioned on June 13, 2023 for directions.d)That this order to be served upon the respondent within 3 days. Upon service the respondent to file a response within 7 days.It is so ordered.
RULING, READ AND DELIVERED ON 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2023. ...............................D. KAVEDZAJUDGE