[2004] KEHC 1417 (KLR)
The court found that no action had been taken by either party in the prosecution of the suit since 1995. In accordance with the rules of civil procedure, where a party fails to take steps to prosecute a suit for an inordinate period, the court is empowered to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The absence of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1417 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kipchirchir Tabut (Suing Through Kiptabut Lelei); Defendant: Jacob B. K. Lagat
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 84 of 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- suit dismissed for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Case Inactivity, Notice to Show Cause
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kipchirchir Tabut (Suing Through Kiptabut Lelei)
Plaintiff
Jacob B. K. Lagat
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to prolonged inactivity.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that no action had been taken by either party in the prosecution of the suit since 1995. In accordance with the rules of civil procedure, where a party fails to take steps to prosecute a suit for an inordinate period, the court is empowered to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The absence of any explanation or action from the parties justified the dismissal of the suit to prevent abuse of court process and ensure expeditious disposal of cases.
Court Disposition
suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
3 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO.84 OF 1995 KIPCHIRCHIR TABUT (Suing Through KIPTABUT LELEI ………………………………..…………...……….……… PLAINTIFF VERSUS JACOB B. K. LAGAT ……………………………….……………..……… DEFENDANT RULING
This matter came for notice to show cause why suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties have not taken any action for the prosecution of the case since 1995. I therefore dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. Dated at Eldoret this 11th day of February, 2004. George Dulu Judge