[2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting the grant of bond pending appeal. The applicant's disability and concerns about Covid-19 were not considered exceptional in the current context, given the availability of vaccines and the ability of the prison to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Sostem Kipkemoi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E083 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Bond Pending Appeal, Sexual Offences, Exceptional Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sostem Kipkemoi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bond pending appeal under section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying release on bond pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting the grant of bond pending appeal. The applicant's disability and concerns about Covid-19 were not considered exceptional in the current context, given the availability of vaccines and the ability of the prison to provide necessary accommodations such as a wheelchair. The court also declined to assess the merits of the appeal at this stage, as it was actively being heard. There was no likelihood of delay in the determination of the appeal, as it would be canvassed by written submissions. Consequently, the application for bond pending appeal was found to be unmerited and dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bond pending appeal is dismissed.
- The prison is ordered to provide the applicant with a wheelchair for his movement in the facility.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Kipkemoi v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E083 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR) (21 July 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E083 of 2021
A. Ong’injo, J
July 21, 2022
Between
Sostem Kipkemoi
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. Applicant herein seeks bond pending appeal pursuant to section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for reasons that he has an arguable appeal in Criminal Appeal Number E075 of 2021. He also argued in the supporting affidavit that he has a disability and the prison infrastructure doesn’t favor his condition. He relies on Criminal Appeal 23 of 2015 Said Safari vs Republic where appellant was granted bond of Ksh100000 with a surety of a similar amount. Applicant further argued that it was dangerous for him to remain in custody due toCovid 19 pandemic as he had underlying conditions and that prison due to overcrowding was not an adequate place for him.
2. The background facts are that applicant was convicted and sentenced in Sexual Offences number 64 of 2020 to serve 10 years’ prison sentence for the offence of contrary to section 3(1) (a)(c) as read with (3) of the Sexual Offences Act of 2006 on August 5, 2021.
3. The application is unopposed.
Analysis And Determination 4. The principles for granting bond pending appeal are well set out in the case of Jivraj Shah v Republic [1986] eKLR which include;a)The existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which a court of appeal can fairly conclude that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail.b)Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.c)Whether there is a likelihood of the appellant having served a substantial part of the sentence by the time of appeal is heard and determined.
Does the appeal have overwhelming chances of success? 5. The bail and bond policy guidelines page 27 paragraph 4. 30 “provides that the burden is on the convicted person to demonstrate that there is an overwhelming chance of success. ’’ In this particular instance it would prejudicial to the Appellant if the court gave an opinion on this as the criminal appeal lodged by the applicant is currently being heard in this court.Is there a possibility of delay in hearing and determination of the appeal?
6. The applicant herein was sentenced and convicted to serve 10 years in jail for the offence of rape contrary to section 3(1) (a)(c) as read with (3) of the Sexual Offences Act of 2006. The applicant has appealed both conviction and sentence in Criminal Appeal 075 of 2021. As in general court operations the appeal will be canvassed vide written submissions and this will not take a lot of time. There is no possibility in delay and determination of the appealThe existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which a court of appeal can fairly conclude that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail.
7. Applicant avers that he has a disability and underlying conditions that make him susceptible to Covid 19. However, Covid 19 is not threatening as there has since been numerous vaccines that are available. Applicant further avers he is disabled and prison facilities are inadequate. However, in my considered opinion disability is not an exceptional circumstance. This court hereby orders that the prison provides the appellant with a wheel chair for his movement in the facility.
8. The upshot of the matter is that the application is unmerited and is dismissed accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 21ST OF JULY 2022HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of:-Appellant in person - present in personMr. Ngiri for RespondentMr. Ogwel - Court AssistantHON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGE