[2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting the grant of bond pending appeal. The applicant's disability and concerns about Covid-19 were not considered exceptional in the current context, given the availability of vaccines and the ability of the prison to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12910 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sostem Kipkemoi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E083 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Bond Pending Appeal, Sexual Offences, Exceptional Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bond Pending Appeal Sexual Offences Exceptional Circumstances Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sostem Kipkemoi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Bond Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bond pending appeal under section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying release on bond pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting the grant of bond pending appeal. The applicant's disability and concerns about Covid-19 were not considered exceptional in the current context, given the availability of vaccines and the ability of the prison to provide necessary accommodations such as a wheelchair. The court also declined to assess the merits of the appeal at this stage, as it was actively being heard. There was no likelihood of delay in the determination of the appeal, as it would be canvassed by written submissions. Consequently, the application for bond pending appeal was found to be unmerited and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for bond pending appeal is dismissed.
  • The prison is ordered to provide the applicant with a wheelchair for his movement in the facility.