[2024] KEHC 4319 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, a first-time offender convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm, had demonstrated remorse and had the support of both his family and the complainant, who had forgiven him. The probation report recommended community service, and there was no evidence of ongoing risk to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 4319 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nickson Kipkoech; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E036 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Review
- Outcome
- Custodial sentence revised; substituted with community service order.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Assault Bodily Harm, Probation Reports, Community Service Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nickson Kipkoech
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's custodial sentence should be revised in light of the probation report and family reconciliation.
- 2 Whether community service is an appropriate alternative to imprisonment for a first-time offender convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, a first-time offender convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm, had demonstrated remorse and had the support of both his family and the complainant, who had forgiven him. The probation report recommended community service, and there was no evidence of ongoing risk to the community. The court held that, in line with sentencing principles and the Probation Officer's recommendation, a non-custodial sentence was appropriate. The remaining sentence was substituted with a community service order to be served under supervision, as the objectives of rehabilitation and reintegration could be achieved without further incarceration.
Court Disposition
Custodial sentence revised; substituted with community service order.
Orders
- The applicant's remaining sentence of 10 months imprisonment is substituted with a community service order to be served at Barsombe chief's office under probation supervision.
- The applicant is to be released from custody forthwith to commence community service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Kipkoech v Republic (Criminal Revision E036 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 4319 (KLR) (11 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4319 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Criminal Revision E036 of 2024
RN Nyakundi, J
April 11, 2024
Between
Nickson Kipkoech
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged with the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 25 of the Penal code. The particulars of the offence were that on the 30th day of August, 2023 at Karakwa village in Soy sub-county within Uasin Gishu county assaulted Vincent Kipchirchir thereby occasioning him actual bodily harm.
2. The applicant pleaded guilty to the offence before Hon. O. Mogire on 13th September, 2023 and as a consequence, he was convicted on his own plea of guilty and sentenced to serve two years imprisonment.
3. The applicant has approached this court pursuant to sections 357,362,364& 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code as construed with Article 50(2) (p) & (q) as conjunctively read with Article 50(6)(a)&(b) of the Constitution.
4. The applicant seeks a sentence review based on the Probation sentence report dated 20th March, 2024. According to the report, the applicant is a 26-year-old. Prior to the offence he was living with his parents and siblings at their home in Kakarwa area. He has been engaged as a casual laborer to earn a living. The applicant’s family members through his mother and brother expressed readiness to welcome him back home. They stated that they had been visiting him in prison. Finally, that the complainant is the applicant’s younger brother who has since forgiven him.
5. The report recommended that the applicant should be released on community service for the remaining sentence period of 10 months for reasons that he is remorseful and that his home environment is favorable for his return.
6. In determining whether to impose a custodial or non-custodial sentence, the court is required to take into account the following factors: -a)Gravity of the offence: - sentence of imprisonment should be avoided for misdemeanour.b)Criminal history of the offender. Taking into account the seriousness of the offences, first offenders should be considered for non-custodial sentence.c)Character of the offender: - non-custodial sentence are best suited for offenders who are already remorseful and receptive to rehabilitative measures.d)Protection of the community: - where the offender is likely to pose a threat to the community.e)Offender’s responsibility to third parties: - where there are people depending on the offender.f)Children in conflict with the law: - non- custodial orders should be imposed as a matter of course in cases of children in conflict with law, except in circumstances where, in light of the seriousness of the offence coupled with other factors, the court is satisfied that a custodial order is the most appropriate.
7. Considering the above-mentioned factors, I have found efficacy for community-based rehabilitation for the applicant. I see no reason why he should still serve a custodial sentence whereas the family together with the complainant have readily accepted to have him back home. In adherence to the probation officer’s report, he is to serve 10 months at Barsombe chief’s office under supervision by the probation officer.
SIGNED, DATE AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024. …………………………………….R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE