[2006] KEHC 3017 (KLR)
The court found that, although the facts intended to form the basis of the counter-claim may have been within the applicant's knowledge at the time of filing the defence, the nature of the dispute—a serious land matter—warranted a comprehensive resolution. To ensure that all issues between the parties are determined...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 3017 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kiplangat Arap Biator; Defendant: Esther Tala Chepyegon
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 70 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Defence to Include Counter Claim
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend defence to include counter-claim granted.
- Judges
- DK Musinga
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend, Counter Claims, Land Control Board Consent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kiplangat Arap Biator
Plaintiff
Esther Tala Chepyegon
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Defence to Include Counter Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to amend her defence to include a counter-claim.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendment would prejudice the plaintiff/respondent.
- 3 Whether the facts forming the basis of the counter-claim were within the knowledge of the applicant at the time of filing the defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the facts intended to form the basis of the counter-claim may have been within the applicant's knowledge at the time of filing the defence, the nature of the dispute—a serious land matter—warranted a comprehensive resolution. To ensure that all issues between the parties are determined conclusively, the court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment. The court emphasized that discretion must be exercised judicially, considering both the merits of the amendment and potential prejudice to the respondent. In this case, the court determined that granting leave to amend would not unduly prejudice the respondent and would facilitate a final resolution of...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend defence to include counter-claim granted.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the defendant to amend her defence to include a counter-claim within ten (10) days from the date hereof.
- Costs of the application shall be to the plaintiff/respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
Civil Case 70 of 2004
KIPLANGAT ARAP BIATOR ……….....................................................…………….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ESTHER TALA CHEPYEGON …………...............................................………. DEFENDANT
RULING
The applicant/defendant brought an application under the provisions of order VIA rule (1)(2) and 5(1) of the Civil Procedure Rulesseeking leave to amend the statement of defence to include a counter-claim. The application was made on the ground that fresh facts had come to the knowledge of counsel for the applicant after the filing of the defence and those facts would have the effect of altering the nature of the defence if the application herein were to be allowed. The fresh facts referred to were that the plaintiff herein had not applied for consent of the land control board to transfer the suit premises, a parcel of land known as NAKURU/OLENGURUONE/3.
The respondent/plaintiff opposed the said application and sought to rely on a replying affidavit sworn by himself on 31. 8.2005. He denied that the issue of the land control board’s consent was a new one and referred to his earlier affidavit sworn on 9. 3.2004 wherein he stated that the Land Control Board’s consent was granted on 6. 1.1998. He further deposed that the said application had been filed for the purpose of delaying the determination of the suit. He also stated that the applicant had failed to annex a copy of the proposed draft amended defence and counter-claim.
I have carefully considered the contents of the affidavits filed by the parties herein. Although the court has discretion to grant leave to a party to amend his pleadings, such discretion ought to be exercised in a judicial manner and not arbitrarily and so the court must consider whether the amendment sought to be made is merited and whether it will prejudice the respondent if granted. I am aware that there is a serious land dispute between the parties and this court has even dealt with an appeal emanating from the said land dispute. Ordinarily the court will not grant leave to amend pleadings where it is shown that the facts or material that are intended to form the basis of a counter-claim were within the knowledge of the applicant at the time of filing a statement of defence.
However, given the nature of this matter, so that the dispute between the parties can be resolved once and for all, I grant leave to the applicant to amend her defence to include a counter-claim. She should do so within the next ten (10) days from the date hereof. The costs of this application shall be to the plaintiff/respondent.
DATED AT NAKURU THIS 31st DAY OF March, 2006
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
31/3/2006
Ruling delivered in open court in the presence of Mr. Mbeche holding brief for Mr. Mugambi for the applicant and Mr. Kahiga for the respondent.
D. MUSINGA
JUDGE
31/3/2006