[2023] KEHC 20785 (KLR)
The court found that, although the appellant was lawfully convicted of defilement under Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act, the mandatory twenty-year sentence was harsh and excessive given the specific facts: both the appellant and the complainant were teenagers, the relationship was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 20785 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edwin Amdany Kiplangat; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 43 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence varied; custodial sentence set aside; probation supervision order imposed
- Judges
- TM Matheka
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, Sentencing Principles, Sexual Offences Act, Probation Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Amdany Kiplangat
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory twenty-year sentence for defilement was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the appellant was suitable for a probation supervision order instead of continued imprisonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although the appellant was lawfully convicted of defilement under Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act, the mandatory twenty-year sentence was harsh and excessive given the specific facts: both the appellant and the complainant were teenagers, the relationship was believed by both to be consensual, there was no evidence of violence, force, deception, or undue influence, and the appellant had already spent a significant period in custody. The Probation Officer's Report was positive, indicating the appellant was not a danger to the community and was accepted by both his and the complainant's families. The court exercised its discretion to...
Court Disposition
sentence varied; custodial sentence set aside; probation supervision order imposed
Orders
- The appellant shall be placed on probation supervision for three years.
- The custodial sentence of twenty years is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kiplangat v Republic (Criminal Appeal 43 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 20785 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 20785 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Appeal 43 of 2019
TM Matheka, J
July 27, 2023
Between
Edwin Amdany Kiplangat
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Sentence
1. The appellant was charged, tried and found guilty of the offence of Defilement Contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act.
2. He was sentenced to the mandatory twenty (20) years sentence imprisonment.
3. On appeal, the conviction was upheld, and the court was of the view, due to the circumstances of the offence and the proximity of age between the complainant and the appellant, the sentence was harsh and excessive.
4. The court sought a Probation Officer’s Report from the Probation and After Care Services which report was filed on May 3, 2023 and forwarded to me via email. I requested for a copy of the same to enable me write the sentence ruling.
5. I have carefully considered the Probation Officer’s Report, it speaks positively of the accused person, he admits the offence, he and the victim were teenagers in what both believed to be a consensual sexual relationship, whereby the girl went to his home and did not return to her home leading to this prosecution.
6. He has been in custody since 2017.
7. He is not a danger to himself or other persons, especially young girls. He is welcome back to the community and his family and the family of the victim have no issues with him.
8. Youthful offenders even in sexual related offences where the facts demonstrate that no violence, force, deception was used, and the age difference is not too wide to amount to undue influence or pressure, or use of power over the victim, both the victim and the perpetrator ought to be considered for correction, guidance and counseling.
9. This is one of those cases where the accused has already spent time in prison custody. In my view the recommended probation supervision order is suitable for him.
10. The appellant will be placed on probation supervision for 3 (three) years.
11. Orders accordingly
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY 27THJULY 2023…………………………………………………MUMBUA T. MATHEKAJUDGEIn the presence of;C/A DaisyFor state Ms. MurungaAppellant present virtually at Naivasha GK Prison