[2025] KEELC 70 (KLR)
The court determined that it cannot adopt or enforce the survey and adjudication reports as binding orders without first hearing the parties on the merits of the case. The court emphasized its role as a neutral arbitrator and the necessity of procedural fairness, particularly given the potential impact of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 70 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Pius Kanda Kiplimo; Defendant: Settlement Fund Trustees; Defendant: County Registrar Trans Nzoia County; Defendant: County Surveyor Trans Nzoia County; Defendant: Attorney General; Defendant: Ernest Kemboi Chelimo; Defendant: Musa Wabwa; Defendant: Suzanna Cheboi; Defendant: National Land Commission
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 58 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Pre Trial Directions; Compliance With Order 11 C.p.r. Ordered
- Outcome
- Pre-trial directions issued; matter to proceed to hearing on merits.
- Judges
- CK Nzili
- Legal Topics
- Land Adjudication, Settlement Scheme Disputes, Survey Reports, Court Controlled Inquiry
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pius Kanda Kiplimo
Plaintiff
Settlement Fund Trustees
Defendant
County Registrar Trans Nzoia County
Defendant
County Surveyor Trans Nzoia County
Defendant
Attorney General
Defendant
Ernest Kemboi Chelimo
Defendant
Musa Wabwa
Defendant
Suzanna Cheboi
Defendant
National Land Commission
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Pre Trial Directions; Compliance With Order 11 C.p.r. Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should adopt the survey and adjudication reports as binding orders before hearing the parties on merits.
- 2 Whether the court can impose recommendations affecting non-parties and other pending matters without consolidation or hearing.
- 3 What procedural steps should be taken before the matter is set down for hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that it cannot adopt or enforce the survey and adjudication reports as binding orders without first hearing the parties on the merits of the case. The court emphasized its role as a neutral arbitrator and the necessity of procedural fairness, particularly given the potential impact of the recommendations on non-parties and other pending matters in different courts. The court directed compliance with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules to facilitate pre-trial procedures and set the matter down for hearing, allowing parties the liberty to adopt the reports at the hearing if they so choose.
Court Disposition
Pre-trial directions issued; matter to proceed to hearing on merits.
Orders
- Parties shall comply with Order 11 Civil Procedure Rules within two weeks from the date of the ruling.
- Parties are at liberty to adopt the reports at the hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
Kiplimo v Settlement Fund Trustees & 7 others (Environment & Land Case 58 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 70 (KLR) (22 January 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 70 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Environment & Land Case 58 of 2019
CK Nzili, J
January 22, 2025
Between
Pius Kanda Kiplimo
Plaintiff
and
Settlement Fund Trustees
1st Defendant
County Registrar Trans Nzoia County
2nd Defendant
County Surveyor Trans Nzoia County
3rd Defendant
Attorney General
4th Defendant
Ernest Kemboi Chelimo
5th Defendant
Musa Wabwa
6th Defendant
Suzanna Cheboi
7th Defendant
National Land Commission
8th Defendant
Ruling
1. On 20/7/2022, this court issued an order for the 3rd respondent to survey plot Nos. 1327, 1328, 1329, and 1395 at the Milimani Settlement Scheme and to file a report before the court. The plaintiff had made the application. Pursuant to the order, a report dated 30/11/2022 was tabled before the court. Several findings or recommendations were made, including a revision of the entire scheme map.
2. Subsequently, to this report, the court, at the instance of the parties was informed of other similar matters filed by other parties pending in other courts that are likely to be affected by the proposed recommendations. The 1st - 3rd defendants sought witness summons to the County Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Trans Nzoia County to testify before the court could make further directions. An order to that effect was made on 16/9/2024. The said officer attended court on 31/10/2024 and made a recommendation for the whole Scheme to be resurveyed. The officer was also cross-examined and re-examined by the parties' advocates on record.
3. Afterward, the court directed parties to file written submissions regarding the way forward. The 1st - 4th respondents rely on written submissions dated 13/11/2024. Reliance is placed on Nyakinyua Mugumo Tree Women Society -vs.- Nyakinyua Mugumo Tree Ltd [2007] eKLR, that the court can order for a court-controlled inquiry in public interest, through which proprietary rights of the allotees, who hold titles following registration of discharges are preserved and protected during the inquiry.
4. The court has looked at the pleadings by the parties, such as the amended plaint dated 11/11/2019, the 4th defendant's defense dated 22/3/2021, the 3rd defendant's defense and counterclaim dated and filed on 4/12/2023 and the 7th defendant's defense dated 20/11/2021.
5. Other than preliminary rulings, the suit is yet to be set down for hearing on merits. The reports made by the respective officers especially the 3rd defendant and the County Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, are yet to be adopted by consent of the parties for enforcement purposes as an order or decree of this court. A court may not impose a decision on parties without hearing them on merits. The court may not descend to the arena of the dispute yet it is supposed to be a neutral arbitrator of the matter. The court has not been moved to consolidate all the pending matters involving the Scheme falling in other courts, yet the implications of the recommendations in the two reports shall have profound effects on non-parties to this suit and on other matters pending before other courts.
6. Consequently, I direct that parties shall comply with Order 11 C.P.R. within two (2) weeks from the date hereof and set down the matter for hearing. Parties are at liberty to adopt the reports at the hearing.
7. Orders accordingly.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KITALE THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. HON. C.K. NZILIJUDGE, ELC KITALE.