[2023] KEHC 21826 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 21826 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the preliminary objection, including whether the 4th defendant is an exempt society, res judicata, locus standi, and compliance with Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, all required the ascertainment of facts and could not be determined as pure points of law. Citing the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 21826 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Kirigua; Plaintiff: Gaciku Muhu; Plaintiff: Henry Ogoye; Defendant: Samora S Sikalie; Defendant: Mburu Ngugi; Defendant: Don Smith; Defendant: Karen Langata District Association; Interested Party: I&M Bank Ltd; Interested Party: The Registrar Of Societies
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E068 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Res Judicata, Locus Standi, Societies Act, Advocate Conflict of Interest
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Preliminary Objection Res Judicata Locus Standi Societies Act Advocate Conflict of Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Kirigua

Plaintiff

Gaciku Muhu

Plaintiff

Henry Ogoye

Plaintiff

Samora S Sikalie

Defendant

Mburu Ngugi

Defendant

Don Smith

Defendant

Karen Langata District Association

Defendant

I&M Bank Ltd

Interested Party

The Registrar Of Societies

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the notice of preliminary objection meets the legal threshold for preliminary objections.
  2. 2 Whether the matter is res judicata.
  3. 3 Whether the 4th defendant is an exempt society under the Societies Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the preliminary objection, including whether the 4th defendant is an exempt society, res judicata, locus standi, and compliance with Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, all required the ascertainment of facts and could not be determined as pure points of law. Citing the authority of Mukhisa Biscuit Manufacturers Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd, the court held that a preliminary objection is only sustainable where it raises a pure point of law and not where factual disputes exist. Consequently, the preliminary objection was dismissed as it did not meet the legal threshold for a preliminary objection.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection dated 17/4/2023 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.