[2022] KEHC 13300 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying the grant of bail pending appeal. Upon reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the trial court's judgment, and the sentence, the court determined there were no overwhelming chances of success in the appeal nor a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13300 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Kirimi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 103 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for bail pending appeal declined
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Defilement Offence, Sentence Length, Risk of Absconding
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Kirimi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal under the circumstances.
- 2 Whether there exist exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying grant of bail pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success or the sentence will be substantially served before the appeal is heard.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional or unusual circumstances justifying the grant of bail pending appeal. Upon reviewing the memorandum of appeal, the trial court's judgment, and the sentence, the court determined there were no overwhelming chances of success in the appeal nor a prospect that the sentence or a substantial part of it would be served before the appeal is heard. The applicant's personal circumstances, including family hardship, did not meet the threshold for exceptional circumstances as established in precedent. Consequently, the application for bail pending appeal lacked merit and was declined.
Court Disposition
application for bail pending appeal declined
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is declined.
- The appeal shall be set down for hearing on a date convenient to counsel for the accused and for the DPP.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Kirimi v Republic (Criminal Appeal 103 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 13300 (KLR) (29 September 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 13300 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Criminal Appeal 103 of 2022
EM Muriithi, J
September 29, 2022
Between
Michael Kirimi
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
RULING ON BOND PENDING APPEAL 1. By an application dated August 3, 2022 the applicant seeks an order for bail pending the hearing and determination of the application. In the grounds for the application, the applicant assets constitutional rights to bail and his circumstances as breadwinner for his family and consequently a prejudice and regrettable harm that he will be occasioned by the incarceration.
2. Bail is opposed by the DPP who asserts that there no chance of success of the intended appeal as the accused was rightly convicted and there are no exceptional circumstances to warrant the grant of bail pending appeal; and that on account of the long sentence chances of absconding are high.
3. The accused was by the judgment of the trial court dated July 26, 2022 convicted for the offence of defilement contrary to section 8 (1) as read with 8 (4) of the sexual offences Act and subsequently sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years.
4. InJivraj Shah V R[1986]KLR 605; Mutua v R. [1988] KLR 497; Sono v R [1972]EA 476 and Dominic Karanja v R [1986] 612, principles for grant of bail pending appeal have been established as:-a.Whether there exists exceptional or unusual circumstances which justify grant of bail in the interest of justice;b.Exceptional circumstances exist where appeal has overwhelming chances of success or substantial merit in the appeal and that the sentence or substantial part of it will have been served before the appeal is heard; andc.the good character of the applicant hardships his family or his ill health or an assertion that the applicant shall not abscond if released on bail are not exceptional or un usual circumstances.
5. Having considered the “memorandum of appeal,” the judgment and sentence of the trial court, this court does not find that there exists unusual or exceptional circumstances by way of overwhelming chances of success of the appeal or a prospect that the sentence or substantial part of it shall have been served by the time the appeal is heard.
6. Accordingly, the court does not find merit in the application for bail pending appeal, and the same is declined.
7. The appeal shall be set down for hearing on a date convenient to the counsel for the accused and for the DPP.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022. EDWARD M. MURIITHIJUDGEAPPEARANCES:Ms. Nandwa for DPP.Mr. Otieno C. for Appellant.