[2024] KEELC 5534 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 5534 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had brought the application for extension of time without undue delay and had provided satisfactory reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The court was satisfied that good and sufficient cause had been demonstrated, as required by both the Civil Procedure Act and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 5534 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Teto Kirrinkai; Respondent: Joseph Mwai; Respondent: John Kamau; Respondent: County Government of Kajiado
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E011 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Occupation of Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Stay of Execution Appeals From Subordinate Courts Occupation of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Teto Kirrinkai

Applicant

Joseph Mwai

Respondent

John Kamau

Respondent

County Government of Kajiado

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order of stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had brought the application for extension of time without undue delay and had provided satisfactory reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The court was satisfied that good and sufficient cause had been demonstrated, as required by both the Civil Procedure Act and the Environment and Land Court Act. The applicants' occupation of the suit property was also noted. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing and serving the memorandum of appeal, deeming the draft memorandum properly filed upon payment of requisite fees. The issue of stay of execution was deferred to be canvassed after the appeal is filed, and the...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • Time within which to file and serve the memorandum of appeal is extended; the draft memorandum of appeal is deemed properly filed upon payment of requisite fees.
  • The issue of stay of execution will be canvassed once the appeal is filed.