[1999] KECA 114 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 114 (KLR)

The Court found that the application for stay of execution was incompetent because the High Court had not made any decision or order capable of being appealed against. Without such a decision, there was no jurisdiction for the Court of Appeal to entertain the application. The absence of an appealable order rendered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 114 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kisii Farmers Union Limited & 2 Others; Respondent: Oriental Hardware Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 281 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
Outcome
application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Competency of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Competency of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kisii Farmers Union Limited & 2 Others

Applicant

Oriental Hardware Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is competent in the absence of a decision by the High Court capable of being appealed against.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the application for stay of execution was incompetent because the High Court had not made any decision or order capable of being appealed against. Without such a decision, there was no jurisdiction for the Court of Appeal to entertain the application. The absence of an appealable order rendered the application fatally defective, and it was accordingly struck out with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The application is struck out with costs.