[1996] KECA 32 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 32 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that, as this was a second appeal and the sentence imposed by the High Court was legal, it had no jurisdiction to interfere with the sentence. The appeal against sentence was therefore dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 32 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kisoro Makoko; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 109 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals on Sentence, Jurisdiction of Appellate Court
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeals on Sentence Jurisdiction of Appellate Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kisoro Makoko

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to interfere with a legal sentence on a second appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that, as this was a second appeal and the sentence imposed by the High Court was legal, it had no jurisdiction to interfere with the sentence. The appeal against sentence was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.