[2001] KECA 294 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 294 (KLR)

The Court found that the appeal was filed well outside the prescribed time limit and that there was no valid extension of time granted to the appellant. Furthermore, Rule 81 of the Court of Appeal Rules did not provide any relief to the appellant in the absence of a valid extension. With the respondent conceding to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 294 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kitale Municipal Council; Respondent: Compware Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 211 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order on Preliminary Objection to Competence of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent.
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Extension of Time, Competence of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Timelines Extension of Time Competence of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kitale Municipal Council

Appellant

Compware Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Order on Preliminary Objection to Competence of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed time period.
  2. 2 Whether there was a valid extension of time for filing the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether Rule 81 of the Court of Appeal Rules could avail the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the appeal was filed well outside the prescribed time limit and that there was no valid extension of time granted to the appellant. Furthermore, Rule 81 of the Court of Appeal Rules did not provide any relief to the appellant in the absence of a valid extension. With the respondent conceding to the incompetence of the appeal, the Court held that the appeal was incompetent and should be struck out.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out as incompetent.
  • There is no order as to costs.