[2019] KEHC 3473 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to comply with directions regarding the filing of submissions, having filed them ninety-four days late without seeking leave. Given the strict timelines governing election petition appeals, the court held that the irregularly filed submissions could not be considered and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 3473 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kitavi Sammy; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Returning Officer Kitui Constituency; Respondent: Katumo Boniface Kilungya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Election Appeal 3 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay and Leave to Come on Record
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the 3rd respondent
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Election Petition Appeals, Stay of Execution, Leave to Appear, Timelines and Filing, Costs Award
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kitavi Sammy
Applicant
Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Returning Officer Kitui Constituency
Respondent
Katumo Boniface Kilungya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay and Leave to Come on Record
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to stay of the taxing officer's decision pending hearing of the reference.
- 2 Whether the applicant's submissions were properly on record given the delay in filing.
- 3 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to comply with directions regarding the filing of submissions, having filed them ninety-four days late without seeking leave. Given the strict timelines governing election petition appeals, the court held that the irregularly filed submissions could not be considered and were expunged from the record. As the application remained unprosecuted, the court dismissed it with costs to the 3rd respondent, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance in election-related litigation.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the 3rd respondent
Orders
- The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Costs awarded to the 3rd respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITUI
ELECTION PETITION APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2017
KITAVI SAMMY...............................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL &
BOUNDARIES COMMISSION............................................1ST RESPONDENT
2. RETURNING OFFICER KITUI CONSTITUENCY....2ND RESPONDENT
3. KATUMO BONIFACE KILUNGYA...............................3RD RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. Kitavi Sammy, the Applicant approached this court by way of Chamber Summons that was filed during the vacation under Certificate of Urgency. The urgent plea was to have orders sought in the Application dated 26th March 2019 allowed on interim basis pending hearing of the Reference.
2. In the application dated the 26th March 2019, the firm of Kimathi Wanjohi Muli Advocates sought leave to come on record and the applicant prayed for stay of the decision of the taxing officer dated the 6th November 2018 pending hearing of the application and Reference.
3. The instant application is based on grounds that the applicant’s goods have been proclaimed therefore the auctioneer may sell them by way of public auction which may cause the Applicant to suffer irreparable damages.
4. This court certified the application as urgent on the 10th September 2019 and scheduled it to be heard on 18. 9.2019. On the stated date the application was withdrawn. Mr. Kithome,counsel holding brief for Mr. Kivuva for the Applicant proceeded to notify the court that Counsel retained by the Applicant had filed submissions. It was however argued by Mr. Mwalimu, counsel for the Respondents that the submissions were irregularly on record.
5. On the 27/6/2019 this court gave directions on the matter and granted the Applicant fourteen (14) days within which to file and serve submissions. The Applicant purported to file submissions some ninety four (94) days later. The application has been filed in an election Petition Appeal where timelines are strict. The submissions that were filed without leave of this court were therefore expunged from the record.
6. In that regard, the application remained unprosecuted. Therefore it stands dismissed with costs to the 3rd Respondent.
7. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kitui this 26th day of September 2019.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE