https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10013
The Court found the cross-appeal successful and the application unopposed, so the Court of Appeal judgment and orders could properly be adopted as the High Court's order and decree for purposes of execution. The respondent was therefore ordered to refund Kshs. 5,214,214.59, failing which warrants of attachment and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 10013 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kitek (7) Limited; 1st Defendant: Chairman - Colonel Charles Wanakuta; 2nd Defendant: Secretary-Colonel John Swinfen; 3rd Defendant: Assistant Secretary-Colonel Wycliffe Angoya; 4th Defendant: The Territoral Commander-John Malaba; 5th Defendant: The Territoral Commander-John Wainright; 6th Defendant: The Territoral Commander-William Roberts; 7th Defendant: The Chief Secretary - Kenneth G. Hodder; 8th Defendant: The Chief Secretary-Col. Gabriel Kathuri; 9th Defendant: The Chief Secretary - Benjamin Mnyampi; 10th Defendant: The Financial Secretary - Lt. Col. Jeqeza Timothy Mbaso
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 166 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Adopt Court of Appeal Judgment and Issue Execution Orders
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Judges
- ["F Gikonyo"]
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Judgment, Cross Appeal, Refund Order, Warrants of Attachment and Sale, Execution of Appellate Orders, Unopposed Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kitek (7) Limited
Plaintiff
Chairman - Colonel Charles Wanakuta
1st Defendant
Secretary-Colonel John Swinfen
2nd Defendant
Assistant Secretary-Colonel Wycliffe Angoya
3rd Defendant
The Territoral Commander-John Malaba
4th Defendant
The Territoral Commander-John Wainright
5th Defendant
The Territoral Commander-William Roberts
6th Defendant
The Chief Secretary - Kenneth G. Hodder
7th Defendant
The Chief Secretary-Col. Gabriel Kathuri
8th Defendant
The Chief Secretary - Benjamin Mnyampi
9th Defendant
The Financial Secretary - Lt. Col. Jeqeza Timothy Mbaso
10th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Adopt Court of Appeal Judgment and Issue Execution Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal judgment and orders could be adopted as the judgment and decree of the High Court.
- 2 Whether the applicants were entitled to execution by warrants of attachment and sale.
- 3 What amount, if any, the respondent was required to refund to the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the cross-appeal successful and the application unopposed, so the Court of Appeal judgment and orders could properly be adopted as the High Court's order and decree for purposes of execution. The respondent was therefore ordered to refund Kshs. 5,214,214.59, failing which warrants of attachment and sale would issue.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- The Court of Appeal judgment and order were adopted as the order and decree of the High Court.
- The respondent shall refund the applicant Kshs. 5,214,214.59 within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Kitek (7) Ltd v Wanakuta & 9 others (Sued in Their Capacities as officials of the Salvation Army) (Civil Case 166 of 2012) [2026] KEHC 10013 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (9 July 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 10013 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) Commercial and Tax Civil Case 166 of 2012 F Gikonyo, J July 9, 2026 Between Kitek (7) Limited Plaintiff and Chairman - Colonel Charles Wanakuta 1st Defendant Secretary-Colonel John Swinfen 2nd Defendant Assistant Secretary-Colonel Wycliffe Angoya 3rd Defendant The Territoral Commander-John Malaba 4th Defendant The Territoral Commander-John Wainright 5th Defendant The Territoral Commander-William Roberts 6th Defendant The Chief Secretary - Kenneth G. Hodder 7th Defendant The Chief Secretary-Col. Gabriel Kathuri 8th Defendant The Chief Secretary - Benjamin Mnyampi 9th Defendant The Financial Secretary - Lt. Col. Jeqeza Timothy Mbaso 10th Defendant Sued in Their Capacities as officials of the Salvation Army Ruling 1.The defendants who are the applicants in the notice of motion dated 19th May 2025 expressed to be brought under sections 28, 29 and 66 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 22 Rule 7 and Order 51 Rule of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2022 seek the court to adoption of the Court of Appeal’s judgment of 31st March 2023 and its orders of 8th November 2023 as the order and decree of the High Court. That upon adoption, the court to issue warrants of attachment and sale to Garam Investment Auctioneers who have been nominated by the defendants/applicants to undertake execution. 2.The application is premised on the grounds set out in its body and the supporting affidavit sworn by Lucy Mwaura, Advocate on 19th May 2025. 3.The grounds are: -1.The plaintiff filed an appeal, and the defendants filed a cross-appeal before the Court of Appeal against the judgment of the court dated 9th June 2017 in this matter.2.The Court of Appeal overturned the judgment of the High Court, dismissed the appeal and allowed the cross-appeal.3.The defendants/applicants now wish to execute the order issued by the Court of Appeal.4.It is in the interest of justice that this application be granted as prayed. 4.There was no response filed by the plaintiff despite service and filing of return of service as directed by the court. Analysis and Determination 5.I have considered the application, the supporting affidavit and the exhibits. 6.The applicant exhibited the following; copies of: -1.High Court Judgment dated 9.6.2017;2.Decree dated 9.6.2017;3.Notice of Appeal and Notice of Cross Appeal dated 21.6.2017 and 6.3.2018 respectively;4.Court of Appeal’s Judgment dated 31.3.2023.5.Order dated 31.3.2023. 7.Through the present application the applicants seek the adoption of the Court of Appeal’s judgment of 31st March 2023 and its orders of 8th November 2023 as the order and decree of the High Court. 8.The applicants cross appeal against the judgment of 9.6.2017 before the Court of Appeal was successful. Para. 71 of the Court of Appeal’s Judgment dated 31.3.2023 states: -“In conclusion, we find the appeal devoid of merit and dismiss it with costs to the respondent. We nonetheless allow the cross-appeal with costs to the cross appellant/ respondent in the appeal. It is so ordered.” 9.The same is expressed in the Order of the same date issued on 8.11.2023 by the Deputy Registrar, Hon. L. D. Ogombe. 10.In the subject Notice of Cross Appeal, the applicants sought that the respondent is ordered to refund the applicant the sum of Kshs. 5,214,214.59 paid towards the High Court judgment within 30 days from the judgment of this court. 11.I find that the applicants’ application is merited. It is allowed in the following terms: -1.the respondent is ordered to refund the applicant the sum of Kshs. 5,214,214.59 paid towards the High Court judgment within 30 days from the date of this ruling.2.In default, warrants of attachment and sale to issue to Garam Investment Auctioneers. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE APPLICATION THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2026-----------------F. GIKONYO MJUDGEIn the presence of: -Ms. Wanjeri for defendantNo appearance by plaintiffCA- Ivan/Aggrey