[2023] KEMC 214 (KLR)

Kithuku v Chumo & another (Civil Suit 7590 of 2020) [2023] KEMC 214 (KLR) (31 August 2023) (Judgment)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 214 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts

Civil Suit 7590 of 2020

JP Aduke, SRM

August 31, 2023

Between

Gideon Ndambuki Kithuku

Plaintiff

and

Ronald Chumo & another

Defendant

Judgment

1. The Plaintiff filed this suit against the defendants after he sustained injuries following a road traffic accident on 09th April 2020 along Lunga Lunga Road in Nairobi. In the plaint available on record, the plaintiff avers he was a lawful driver of motor cycle registration number KMED 652Y when the 1st Defendant either acting as servant/agent/authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KCR 426W negligently drove the said motor vehicle that it collided with KMED 652Y causing the Plaintiff to suffer injuries.

2The Plaintiff blames the Defendants and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintiff further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendants.

3. The particulars of injuries sustained by the Plaintiff are captured in para 4 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are also captured in para 4 of the Plaint. The Plaintiff prays for general damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities of life, special damages, costs of the suit and interest at court rates.

4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. The suit is defended At the hearing thereof, parties each called one witness who testified on oath and whose evidence was tested in cross-examination. Parties filed and exchanged submissions. The issues for determination before this court are two:

1. Liability 5. With respect to Liability, I have seen a copy of the Abstract from Police Records confirming further details in respect of the accident victim and the said motor vehicle registration number KCR 426W. I have seen a copy of the Motor Vehicle Search Records confirming ownership of the said motor vehicle. I have also relied on the testimony of PW1 on record. This confirmation and chronology settles the issue of liability in my view. For the avoidance of doubt, I find that liability is apportioned at a ratio of 100:0 in favor of the Plaintiff.

2. Quontum 6. The Plaintiff prays for General Damages, Special Damages, future medical expenses, Costs of the Suit and any other relief. With respect to Special Damages, the Plaint prays for KES 3,550/- as captured in the Plaint. I have seen receipts on record attesting to KES 3,550/- only. It is settled principle that special damages must be pleaded and proved. I find that KES 3,550/- has been pleaded and proved and award the same.

7. With respect to loss of earnings, it is settled law that a claim for loss of earnings/amenities of life is of the nature of special damages. This means the same must be pleaded and strictly proved on a balance of probability. From the documents available on record, I have not seen any documentary proof of the income the plaintiff used to make prior to the said road traffic accident. In the absence of documentary proof, the plaintiff elected not to call any witnesses to testify on this alleged fact. On a balance of probabilities, I find myself persuaded and bound by the holding of the court of appeal in Cecilia W. Mwangi & Another vs Ruth W. Mwangi CA Civil Appeal Number 251 of 1997EKLR and SJ vs Franscesco Di Nello & Another (2015) eKLR on how to treat loss of amenities of life/loss of earnings as a special damage claim. Consequently, I make no award in this regard.

8. With respect to general damages for pain and suffering, I have considered all the submissions on record and the authorities annexed thereto. I have also considered all the exhibits on record. In particular, I have relied on the reasoning of the court in Civil Appeal Number 126 of 2018 Benuel Bosire vs Lydia Kemunto Mokora[2019]eKLR and Patrisiah Adhiambo Omolo vs Emily Mandala[2020] EKLR where the courts awarded general damages for comparable injuries. From the documents on record, the plaintiff in this instance suffered a fracture of the right leg when the accident happened. Taking into account that no amount of damages can restore the Plaintiff to what he was prior to the said accident, the rate of inflation and cost of living, I hereby award KES 400,000/- as general damages.

9. In conclusion, I enter judgement in favour of the plaintiff as follows:1. General damages KES 400,000/-2. Special damages KES 3,550/-3. Costs of the suit.4. Interest on 1 and 3 above at court rates.

1. The Plaintiff shall have costs in this suit and interests as outlined above from the date of this judgement until payment in full.

ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY IN NAIROBI THIS 31ST AUGUST 2023 IN THE ABSENCE/PRESENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 9. 30AM.In the presence of :1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe.2. Counsel for the Plaintiff-3. For the Defence: