[2022] KEELRC 13190 (KLR)
The court found that both the claimants and their counsel failed to attend court on the scheduled hearing date and no satisfactory explanation or evidence was provided for their absence. The court noted that the claimants did not swear affidavits to support the explanation given by their counsel. Furthermore, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 13190 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Kiti; Applicant: Mohammed Abdalla; Applicant: Athman Abdalla; Applicant: John Mambo Kirao; Respondent: Milly Fruits Processing Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 651 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- AK Nzei
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Non Attendance, Setting Aside Orders, Court Attendance Requirements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Kiti
Applicant
Mohammed Abdalla
Applicant
Athman Abdalla
Applicant
John Mambo Kirao
Applicant
Milly Fruits Processing Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal order for non-attendance should be set aside.
- 2 Whether the applicants provided a good reason for their absence on the hearing date.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the claimants and their counsel failed to attend court on the scheduled hearing date and no satisfactory explanation or evidence was provided for their absence. The court noted that the claimants did not swear affidavits to support the explanation given by their counsel. Furthermore, the application sought to set aside a dismissal order dated 23rd March 2022, but no such order existed for that date. The court concluded that there was no merit in the application as no good reason was advanced for the non-attendance, and the dismissal for non-attendance was proper under the applicable procedural rules.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2022 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Kiti & 3 others v Milly Fruits Processing Limited (Cause 651 of 2015) [2022] KEELRC 13190 (KLR) (10 November 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 13190 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Cause 651 of 2015
AM Katiku, J
November 10, 2022
Between
Anthony Kiti
1st Claimant
Mohammed Abdalla
2nd Claimant
Athman Abdalla
3rd Claimant
John Mambo Kirao
4th Claimant
and
Milly Fruits Processing Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. Before me is a Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2022 and filed by the Claimant/Applicants on 20th June 2022. The Claimant/Applicants seek an order to set aside the dismissal order dated 23rd March 2022.
2. The application is supported by an affidavit of Samuel Odhiambo EleakimAdvocate sworn on 14th June 2022. It is deponed in the said affidavit that Counsel for the Claimant/Applicants was not linked to the Court’s online platform when the suit herein was virtually called out for hearing on 23rd March 2022. Counsel depones that on the said date, he first linked into Hon. Ongaya J’s Court for other matters and that when he finally linked into this Court, the suit herein had already been called out and dismissed upon an application by the Respondent’s Counsel in that regard. Counsel further deponed that the Claimants were in his offices on the said date, waiting for their matter to be allocated time for hearing.
3. I have noted that none of the Claimants who are said to have been in the Claimants’ Advocate’s office, ready for the hearing on 23rd March 2022, has sworn an affidavit.
4. The application is opposed by the Respondent whose Counsel, Eddah Kerubo, swore and filed a replying affidavit on 5th July 2022. It is deponed in the said replying affidavit that when the suit herein came up for hearing on 22nd March 2022, neither the Claimants nor their Counsel attended Court and that no proceedings have been exhibited to show that Counsel for the Claimants was, indeed, before another Court.
5. Rule 22(2) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016 provides as follows:-“(2) subject to paragraph (1), where a party fails to attend Court on the day fixed for hearing, the Court may dismiss the suit except for good reason to be recorded.”
6. All the five Claimants and their Counsel were not before the Court on 22nd March 2022 when the suit was called out for hearing, and the Court was not given any reason for the absence. The Respondent’s Counsel was within the Respondent’s right to apply for dismissal of the suit, and the suit was accordingly dismissed for non attendance on the part of the Claimants.
7. The Claimants have not given any good reason why they and their counsel were not in Court on 22nd March 2022. Further, the Claimant/Applicants seek to set aside a dismissal order dated 23rd March 2022, yet there is no dismissal order dated that date.
8. In view of all the foregoing, I find no merit in the Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2022, and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
9. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEORDERIn view of restrictions on physical Court operations occasioned by the COVID-19 Pandemic, this Ruling has been delivered via Microsoft Teams Online Platform. A signed copy will be availed to each party upon payment of Court fees.AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEAppearance:.............. for Claimant/Applicants.............. for Respondent