[2023] KECPT 1054 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 1054 (KLR)

The Tribunal held that membership in a Sacco is a contractual relationship governed by the Sacco's by-laws, which continues until the member formally resigns and is cleared. There was no evidence that the claimant had resigned or that his shares had been liquidated or refunded. Therefore, the claim for refund of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 1054 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Paul Maingi Kitita; Respondent: Minas Savings & Credit Co-op. Soc. Ltd.
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 202/E161 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Prior to Pre Trial Directions
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed; claim to proceed to hearing
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Sacco Membership Rights, Refund of Shares, Refund of Deposits
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Limitation of Actions Sacco Membership Rights Refund of Shares Refund of Deposits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Maingi Kitita

Applicant

Minas Savings & Credit Co-op. Soc. Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Prior to Pre Trial Directions

  1. 1 Whether being a member of a Sacco constitutes a contractual relationship.
  2. 2 Whether the refund of members' shares and deposits in a Sacco is subject to statutory time limitation.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that membership in a Sacco is a contractual relationship governed by the Sacco's by-laws, which continues until the member formally resigns and is cleared. There was no evidence that the claimant had resigned or that his shares had been liquidated or refunded. Therefore, the claim for refund of shares is not subject to the Limitation of Actions Act. Regarding the savings/deposits, the Tribunal found that the claimant had made efforts to pursue his claim, and the ongoing contractual relationship precluded the application of limitation at this stage. The preliminary objection, being based on limitation, failed as it did not meet the threshold for a pure point of law that...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed; claim to proceed to hearing

Orders

  • The preliminary objection application dated 17th May 2022 is dismissed.
  • Costs to be in the cause.