[2013] KEHC 5406 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5406 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had established an arguable case regarding the potential violation of refugees' rights by the government's directive to relocate urban refugees to camps. Given Kenya's constitutional and international obligations to protect refugees, and recognizing refugees as vulnerable persons,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5406 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Kituo Cha Sheria; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 19 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Conservatory order granted; implementation of the government's directive suspended pending further orders.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Fundamental Rights, Refugee Protection, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Fundamental Rights Refugee Protection Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kituo Cha Sheria

Petitioner

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the government's directive to relocate urban refugees to camps violates constitutional and international obligations regarding the rights of refugees.
  2. 2 Whether a conservatory order should issue to prevent implementation of the directive pending hearing of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had established an arguable case regarding the potential violation of refugees' rights by the government's directive to relocate urban refugees to camps. Given Kenya's constitutional and international obligations to protect refugees, and recognizing refugees as vulnerable persons, the court determined that it was necessary to issue a conservatory order to prohibit implementation of the directive pending the hearing and determination of the petition. This was to ensure that the rights of refugees were not prejudiced before the court could fully consider the merits of the case.

Court Disposition

Conservatory order granted; implementation of the government's directive suspended pending further orders.

Orders

  • A conservatory order is issued prohibiting any State officer, public officer, or agent of the Government from implementing the decision contained in the Press Release dated 18th December 2012 pending further orders of the court.
  • The order shall remain in force until 4th February 2013 when the matter will be fixed for directions and further orders as to hearing of the petition.