[2018] KEHC 9743 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9743 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided legal services to the respondent, obtained a taxed bill of costs, and was issued a certificate of taxation. The respondent did not oppose the application or challenge the certificate of taxation. Since the certificate had not been set aside, the applicant was entitled...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 9743 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Koceyo and Company Advocates; Respondent: Nairobi City County
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 25 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed as prayed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Enforcement of Costs, Default Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Enforcement of Costs Default Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Koceyo and Company Advocates

Applicant

Nairobi City County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has disputed or set aside the certificate of taxation.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest and costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided legal services to the respondent, obtained a taxed bill of costs, and was issued a certificate of taxation. The respondent did not oppose the application or challenge the certificate of taxation. Since the certificate had not been set aside, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed amount, interest as prayed, and costs of the application. The court allowed the application in its entirety.

Court Disposition

application allowed as prayed

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for KES 559,549 together with interest at 14% per annum from 31st May 2018 until payment in full.
  • The applicant is awarded the costs of the application.