[2022] KEHC 14222 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines, the period an accused person spends in custody prior to sentencing must be taken into account when computing the sentence to be served. Failure to do so results in an excessive and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 14222 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Morgan Kipkorir Koech; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E009 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Sentence Computation Application
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Computation, Time Spent in Custody, Robbery With Violence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morgan Kipkorir Koech
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Sentence Computation Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be deducted from the applicant's 15-year imprisonment sentence.
- 2 Whether the court is obligated to consider time spent in custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines, the period an accused person spends in custody prior to sentencing must be taken into account when computing the sentence to be served. Failure to do so results in an excessive and disproportionate punishment. The court found that the applicant had spent one year and eleven months in custody before being sentenced and that this period should be included in the computation of the 15-year imprisonment term. Accordingly, the court ordered that the applicant's sentence of 15 years' imprisonment should be deemed to have commenced on 02/02/2015, the date he was first...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The period of 15 years' imprisonment shall commence from 02/02/2015, not from 17/01/2017.
- Orders to issue accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Koech v Republic (Criminal Appeal E009 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 14222 (KLR) (14 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 14222 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kericho
Criminal Appeal E009 of 2022
AN Ongeri, J
October 14, 2022
Between
Morgan Kipkorir Koech
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The application coming for consideration in this ruling is the one dated 23/1/2022 seeking for orders that the period of one year and eleven months the Applicant spent in custody from 02/02/2015 when he was charged until 17/01/2017 when he was sentenced to be reduced from the sentence of 15 years imprisonment.
2. The Appellant was sentenced to death on 17/01/2017 for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the penal code.
3. The Applicant appealed against the sentence and conviction to the high court and the appeal was dismissed but the sentence was reduced to 15 years imprisonment in HCRA No.4 of 2017.
4. I allow the application for the inclusion of the period he was in custody in the computation of the 15 years jail term in accordance with the proviso to Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code CAP 75 which states as follows:-“(2)Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code (Cap 63) every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code.Provided that where the person sentenced under subsection (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.”(Emphasis mine)
5. The duty to factor in the time spent in custody during sentencing is also contained in the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines (under clauses 7. 10 and 7. 11) where it is provided that: -“The proviso to section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Codeobligates the court to take into account the time already served in custody if the convicted person had been in custody during the trial. Failure to do so impacts on the overall period of detention which may result in an excessive punishment that is not proportional to the offence committed. In determining the period of imprisonment that should be served by an offender, the court must take into account the period in which the offender was held in custody during the trial.”
6. The duty of the court to take into account the period an accused person had remained in custody in sentencing under section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code has been acknowledged in several cases in the High Court and the Court of Appeal in Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another v Republic [2018] eKLR. (see also Bethwel Wilson Kibor v Republic [2009] eKLR).
7. The Application dated 23/1/2022 is accordingly allowed.
8. The period of 15 years to start from 02/02/2015 and not from 17/01/2017.
Orders to issue accordingly
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KERICHO THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022. A. N. ONGERIJUDGE