[2020] KEELC 2722 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2722 (KLR)

The court allowed the petitioners' unopposed application for directions, holding that it is just and expedient for the petition to proceed by way of written submissions. The court exercised its discretion to manage the proceedings efficiently, ensuring both parties have the opportunity to file and exchange all...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 2722 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Koeleken Sandiko; Applicant: Salaton NandunguEnkop; Applicant: Parkire NandunguEnkop; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Land Registrar, Narok County; Respondent: Land Adjudication Officer, Narok County; Respondent: Bikatu Ole Saoli & 67 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 380 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Directions for Hearing of Petition
Outcome
Application for directions allowed. Directions issued for hearing of petition by written submissions.
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Fair Administrative Action, Community Land Rights
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Property Fair Administrative Action Community Land Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Koeleken Sandiko

Applicant

Salaton NandunguEnkop

Applicant

Parkire NandunguEnkop

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Land Registrar, Narok County

Respondent

Land Adjudication Officer, Narok County

Respondent

Bikatu Ole Saoli & 67 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Directions for Hearing of Petition

  1. 1 Whether the petition should proceed by way of written submissions.
  2. 2 Whether directions should be given for the exchange of documents and filing of submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the petitioners' unopposed application for directions, holding that it is just and expedient for the petition to proceed by way of written submissions. The court exercised its discretion to manage the proceedings efficiently, ensuring both parties have the opportunity to file and exchange all documents and submissions within set timelines. This approach upholds the principles of fair hearing and expeditious disposal of cases as enshrined in the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act.

Court Disposition

Application for directions allowed. Directions issued for hearing of petition by written submissions.

Orders

  • The petition shall be heard by way of written submissions.
  • Both petitioners and respondents shall file and exchange all documents they wish to rely on within 21 days.