[2024] KEHC 8000 (KLR)
The court found that the central issue before it was the enforcement of its prior order dated 2nd December 2021, which required the parties to submit to DNA testing. The court held that it retained jurisdiction to enforce compliance with this order, as the DNA issue was not concluded and was not addressed in the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 8000 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joseph Wanyiri Kogi; Respondent: Mwaura Kogi Alias Mwaura Wambui; Respondent: Karanja Kogi Alias Karanja Wambui; Respondent: Mwangi Kogi Alias Mwangi Wambui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 61 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Restraining Orders and Enforcement of DNA Testing Order
- Outcome
- Application partially allowed; Respondents ordered to comply with DNA testing order within 30 days; other prayers disallowed; costs in the cause.
- Judges
- HK Chemitei
- Legal Topics
- Dna Testing Orders, Estate Administration, Functus Officio, Interlocutory Injunctions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Wanyiri Kogi
Applicant
Mwaura Kogi Alias Mwaura Wambui
Respondent
Karanja Kogi Alias Karanja Wambui
Respondent
Mwangi Kogi Alias Mwangi Wambui
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Restraining Orders and Enforcement of DNA Testing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents should be compelled to comply with the court's DNA testing order of 2nd December 2021.
- 2 Whether restraining orders should issue against the Respondents regarding land parcel Gatamaiyu/Kamuchege/415 pending DNA compliance.
- 3 Whether the court is functus officio in relation to the land parcel due to prior succession proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the central issue before it was the enforcement of its prior order dated 2nd December 2021, which required the parties to submit to DNA testing. The court held that it retained jurisdiction to enforce compliance with this order, as the DNA issue was not concluded and was not addressed in the prior succession proceedings. The court declined to issue restraining orders regarding land parcel Gatamaiyu/Kamuchege/415, holding that such matters should be addressed in the appropriate forum, such as the succession or Environment and Land Court, as the land issue was not part of the originating summons or the DNA order. The court therefore ordered the Respondents to comply...
Court Disposition
Application partially allowed; Respondents ordered to comply with DNA testing order within 30 days; other prayers disallowed; costs in the cause.
Orders
- The Respondents shall comply with the court orders dated 2nd December 2021 and submit to DNA testing within 30 days from the date of this ruling.
- The remainder of the application is disallowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
Kogi v Kogi alias Mwaura Wambui & 2 others (Civil Suit 61 of 2018) [2024] KEHC 8000 (KLR) (Civ) (4 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8000 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Civil Suit 61 of 2018
HK Chemitei, J
July 4, 2024
Between
Joseph Wanyiri Kogi
Applicant
and
Mwaura Kogi Alias Mwaura Wambui
1st Respondent
Karanja Kogi Alias Karanja Wambui
2nd Respondent
Mwangi Kogi Alias Mwangi Wambui
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. In his application dated 3rd June 2022 the Applicant prays for the following orders:(a)That the court do issue restraining orders against the Respondents, their families and any other party from visiting the grave of the deceased Kogi Mwaura situate at land parcel number Gatamaiyu/Kamuchege/415 or in any other manner dealing with the said land pending the determination of DNA compliance testing as per the courts judgement dated 2nd December 2021.
2. The Applicant prayed for costs of the suit.
3. The application is premised on the sworn affidavit of the Applicant Joseph Wanyiri Kogi who is the legal representative of the estate of the late Kogi Mwaura Wallace dated the same date.
4. The Applicant essentially is praying that the orders of this court dated 2nd December 2021 directing that DNA analysis be carried out on the Respondents be executed.
5. The Applicant is further praying that there be no action over land parcel number Gatamaiyu/Kamuchege/415 where the deceased was buried and that the Respondents be restrained from dealing with the said parcel of land pending the above DNA exercise.
6. The Respondents on the other hand have opposed the said application vide the preliminary objection dated 28th June 2022. The said objection is premised on the grounds that the Applicant’s application ought to be dismissed for the reason that land parcel number Gatamaiyu/Kamuchege/415 was dealt with under Succession Cause No. 3002 A of 2003 and this court was therefore functus officio.
7. The Applicant responded through the preliminary objection and argued that the issues raised therein were dealt with by Justice Ongeri on 1st November 2019 as well as Justice Musyoka. That this court if allowed to deal with the said objection will therefore be dealing with the matters already disposed and essentially sitting as an appellate court.
8. I have carefully read the application the responses and further affidavits and the preliminary objection on board. I have also read the submissions by the parties.
9. I think the issue before this court is clear and straight forward and should not be clouded by various pleadings including the preliminary objection. It is simply the orders of 2nd December 2021 which states;“(a)That the plaintiff and the Defendants submit themselves for DNA test.(b)That the cost of DNA test be met by the plaintiff.(c)That the question of whether or not the Defendants should be ordered to stop using the name “Kogi” and or the question of whether the Registrar General should be directed to rectify his records is one that will have to abide the results of the DNA tests....”.
10. It is clear that the plaintiff therein the late Wallace Kogi passed on 28th December 2021. Samples were collected by Dr. Nyanyal Oduol Johansen and the same is safely kept.
11. If that is the case the Defendants ought therefore to comply with the above orders of the court. The other issues in my view touching on land parcel number Gatamaiyu /Kamuchege/415 ought to be dealt with elsewhere and preferably in the succession file or ELC court or an appropriate forum.
12. For now, this court shall concern itself with the DNA issues. In any event the issue of the land was not, it appears, addressed by the court when it dealt with the DNA issue. I have perused the Originating summons dated 5th October 2018 and I do not find any issue touching on land except the DNA.
13. In the premises I direct that:-(a)The Defendants/Respondents within 30 days from the date herein comply with the court orders dated 2nd December 2021. (b)The application is otherwise disallowed.(c)Costs in the cause.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK THIS 4TH DAY OF JULY 2024. H K CHEMITEIJUDGE