[2023] KEELC 20256 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 20256 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial loss as required for the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The applicant's argument that the decretal sum was not budgeted for in the financial year 2022/2023 does not constitute substantial loss. The court further held that execution of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 20256 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sammy Boit Arap Kogo; Respondent: Kenyan Urban Roads Authority; Respondent: National Lands Commission
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Petition 19 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Judges
EO Obaga
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Compulsory Acquisition, Monetary Decree, Substantial Loss, Public Budgeting
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Compulsory Acquisition Monetary Decree Substantial Loss Public Budgeting

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sammy Boit Arap Kogo

Applicant

Kenyan Urban Roads Authority

Respondent

National Lands Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether payment of the decretal sum will render the appeal nugatory.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial loss as required for the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The applicant's argument that the decretal sum was not budgeted for in the financial year 2022/2023 does not constitute substantial loss. The court further held that execution of a monetary decree does not ordinarily render an appeal nugatory, especially where the applicant has already benefited from the compulsory acquisition and constructed a road without compensating the respondent. The application for stay was therefore dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution pending appeal is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.