[2021] KEELC 2768 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2768 (KLR)

The court found that the orders sought by the plaintiff could not be granted because the land parcel in question had already been subdivided and transferred to third parties who were not parties to the suit, and thus any order to cancel those titles would violate their constitutional rights to property and fair...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2768 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kombo Namurwe Rashid (Suing as the Administrator to the Estate of Rashid Mashauri Namurwe, Deceased); Defendant: David Fabian Mukewa
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 164 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Execution of Judgment, Subdivision of Land, Registration of Title
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Execution of Judgment Subdivision of Land Registration of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kombo Namurwe Rashid (Suing as the Administrator to the Estate of Rashid Mashauri Namurwe, Deceased)

Plaintiff

David Fabian Mukewa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the court can nullify or cancel subdivisions and titles arising from land parcel WEST BUKUSU/SOUTH MATEKA/3503 after judgment was entered for the plaintiff by way of adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the Deputy Registrar can be authorized again to sign documents to facilitate registration of the land in the plaintiff's name after the plaintiff's delay.
  3. 3 Whether the court is functus officio in respect of the orders sought by the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders sought by the plaintiff could not be granted because the land parcel in question had already been subdivided and transferred to third parties who were not parties to the suit, and thus any order to cancel those titles would violate their constitutional rights to property and fair hearing. The court also held that it was functus officio, having already delivered its final judgment and issued a decree, and could not revisit or amend the judgment to include new parties or issues. The plaintiff's delay in executing the judgment and seeking the court's intervention after 16 months was found to be his own fault, and the court dismissed the application as devoid...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2021 is dismissed with costs.