[2023] KEHC 3139 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner, together with his co-convict, committed a vicious robbery with violence, nearly killing the victim and using dangerous weapons. The court held that the gravity of the offence, the near-fatal injuries, and the clear intent to kill justified the original sentence. The petitioner's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3139 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip Kiptoo Korir; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E036 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Death Sentence, Life Imprisonment, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Kiptoo Korir
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the commutation of his death sentence to life imprisonment.
- 2 Whether the circumstances of the offence and the petitioner's personal mitigation justify a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner, together with his co-convict, committed a vicious robbery with violence, nearly killing the victim and using dangerous weapons. The court held that the gravity of the offence, the near-fatal injuries, and the clear intent to kill justified the original sentence. The petitioner's personal circumstances and claims of reformation did not outweigh the seriousness of the crime. The court was not persuaded to exercise its discretion to reduce the sentence, especially since the death sentence had already been commuted to life imprisonment. Accordingly, the petition for resentencing lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition for resentencing is declined and dismissed.
- File closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Korir v Republic (Criminal Petition E036 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3139 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3139 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Petition E036 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
April 12, 2023
Between
Philip Kiptoo Korir
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Petitioner is Phillip Kiptoo Korir. He was convicted and sentenced to suffer death on August 31, 2016 vide Winam Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 646 of 2014 for the offence of Robbery with Violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code.
2. In his petition herein for resentencing dated and filed on 15th November 2022, he claims that he appealed against conviction and sentence vide HCRA No. 28 of 2016 at Kisumu which appeal was dismissed on November 24, 2016.
3. He states that the death sentence was then commuted to life imprisonment on October 19, 2016. That he enrolled and trained in various life’s skills as shown by the testimonials supporting his petition. That he has learnt a lot in prison, his wife disappeared with another man, leaving his four little children with his aged father who is a widower. That he prays for lighter sentence to save his children.
4. I have considered the petition and all the supporting averments and proceedings and judgment in the lower court as well as in the High Court on Appeal vide HCRA No 28 and 29 of 2016 consolidated where he was co-joined with Peter Kiprotich Sigilai his co-accused/appellant.
5. I have considered the circumstances under which the Petitioner/Convict herein robbed PW 1 viciously nearly killing him. The petitioner knew that he has a wife, children and aged widowed father. He, jointly with his co-convict robbed PW 1 of a head of cattle after cutting PW 1 into pieces. The injuries were near fatal. The robbers were also armed with a panga, arrows, bows and iron bars. They do not deserve any mercy of the court as their intentions and mission was to kill the herdsman and take off with the herd.
6. I am not persuaded to interfere with sentence imposed which was merited.
7. I decline to exercise any discretion now that the death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment.
8. I find this Petition not merited. It is declined and dismiss it.
9. File closed. I so order.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE