[2008] KEHC 306 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 306 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant was liable for the plaintiff's injuries as the accident occurred due to the negligent manner in which the defendant's servant controlled the motor vehicle. Liability was apportioned by consent at 60:40 in favour of the plaintiff. The court relied on unchallenged medical evidence,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 306 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kornelius Kweya Ebichet; Defendant: C & P Shoe Industries Ltd; Third Party: John Manuthu Maingi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 1152 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant with apportionment of liability and quantified damages.
Judges
AT Sitati
Legal Topics
Employer Liability, Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Apportionment of Liability
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Employer Liability Personal Injury Assessment of Damages Apportionment of Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kornelius Kweya Ebichet

Plaintiff

C & P Shoe Industries Ltd

Defendant

John Manuthu Maingi

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the course of employment.
  2. 2 What quantum of damages is appropriate for pain, suffering, loss of amenities, future medical expenses, lost earnings, and special damages.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff contributed to the accident and the extent of apportionment of liability.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant was liable for the plaintiff's injuries as the accident occurred due to the negligent manner in which the defendant's servant controlled the motor vehicle. Liability was apportioned by consent at 60:40 in favour of the plaintiff. The court relied on unchallenged medical evidence, which established that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries, including fractures and chronic osteomyelitis, requiring further surgery. The court assessed damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities at Kshs.1,000,000, future medical expenses at Kshs.120,000, lost earnings at Kshs.900,000 (using a multiplier of 15 years and a monthly wage of Kshs.5,000), and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant with apportionment of liability and quantified damages.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of Kshs.1,138,488.00.
  • Defendant to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.