[2025] KEHC 10198 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10198 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to circumstances beyond his control, namely the unavailability of the officer assisting him due to official duties. Applying the principles from Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Salat v IEBC and 7 Others, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10198 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Kibiwott Kosgei; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E410 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Discretion of Court, Criminal Sentencing
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Out of Time Discretion of Court Criminal Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Kibiwott Kosgei

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against conviction and sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained to warrant the court's discretion.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if extension of time is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to circumstances beyond his control, namely the unavailability of the officer assisting him due to official duties. Applying the principles from Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Salat v IEBC and 7 Others, the court held that the applicant had met the threshold for the exercise of judicial discretion to extend time. There was no evidence of prejudice to the respondent, and the application was brought without undue delay. Consequently, the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time and deemed the memorandum of appeal as duly filed within time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to file appeal out of time.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file his appeal out of time.
  • The memorandum of appeal is deemed as duly filed within time.