Download PDF

Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Eldoret

KR v SKK [2025] KEHC 10420 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicant's motion demonstrated sufficient urgency to warrant certification and immediate directions. However, the court declined to grant substantive conservatory orders ex-parte, instead directing that the application be served on the respondent and the issue of conservatory orders be canvassed at an inter-partes hearing. The court emphasized the need for both parties to be heard before substantive interim relief is granted, in line with principles of natural justice and fair hearing. The orders sought were not granted at this stage, save for certification of urgency and directions for service and hearing.

Court disposition

Application certified as urgent; no substantive conservatory orders granted at this stage; directions issued for service and inter-partes hearing.

Orders

  • The application is certified as urgent.
  • The application to be served upon the respondent within 14 days.
  • The matter is fixed for inter-partes hearing on 24th July 2025 before High Court No.2.
  • The issue of conservatory orders to be canvassed at the inter-partes forum.

02

Material facts

Parties

KR

Applicant

SKK

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Matrimonial Cause / Ruling on Certificate of Urgency and Directions on Notice of Motion

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant seeks urgent conservatory orders to restrain the respondent from leasing, selling, disposing of, charging, transferring, collecting income, or otherwise dealing with the matrimonial properties Eldoret/MUN/Block 20 (Kapyemit)/706 and Eldoret/MUN/Block 20 (Kapyemit)/1869. The applicant also seeks to restrain the respondent and his agents from sending threats or engaging in tortious acts detrimental to the applicant, citing risk of dissipation of matrimonial assets and personal harm.
Respondent
The respondent was not present or represented at this ex-parte stage; no arguments were recorded from the respondent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 3A Civil Procedure Act; Article 159 Constitution of Kenya 2010

    Applications for conservatory orders must demonstrate urgency and risk of irreparable harm if orders are not granted.

  2. 02

    Order 51 Civil Procedure Rules; Matrimonial Property Act 2013

    Ex-parte orders are only granted in exceptional circumstances and must be served for inter-partes hearing.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicant's motion demonstrated sufficient urgency to warrant certification and immediate directions. However, the court declined to grant substantive conservatory orders ex-parte, instead directing that the application be served on the respondent and the issue of conservatory orders be canvassed at an inter-partes hearing. The court emphasized the need for both parties to be heard before substantive interim relief is granted, in line with principles of natural justice and fair hearing. The orders sought were not granted at this stage, save for certification of urgency and directions for service and hearing.

Obiter and limits

  • Ex-parte conservatory orders are exceptional and should be sparingly granted to avoid prejudicing the other party.
  • The court is guided by the need to balance urgency with the right to be heard.

Court disposition

Application certified as urgent; no substantive conservatory orders granted at this stage; directions issued for service and inter-partes hearing.

  • The application is certified as urgent.
  • The application to be served upon the respondent within 14 days.
  • The matter is fixed for inter-partes hearing on 24th July 2025 before High Court No.2.
  • The issue of conservatory orders to be canvassed at the inter-partes forum.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2025] KEHC 10420 (KLR)

KR v SKK (Matrimonial Cause E006 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 10420 (KLR) (18 July 2025) (Ruling)

Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10420 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the High Court at Eldoret

Matrimonial Cause E006 of 2025

RN Nyakundi, J

July 18, 2025

Between

KR

Applicant

and

SKK

Respondent

Ruling

1. The Application before Court is a Certificate of Urgency dated 5th May 2025 accompanied with a Notice of Motion expressed to be brought under Section 1, 1B, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 and 17 of the Matrimonial Property Act 2013, Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 seeking the following orders;a.That this Application be certified as urgent and service of the same be dispensed with in the first instance.b.That pending hearing and determination of this case, this Honourable Court be pleased to issue conservatory orders restraining the Respondent either by himself, his agents, employees, servants and/or person from leasing, selling, disposing off, charging, transferring, collecting income and/or in any other way dealing with the properties subject of this cause to wit: -a.Eldoret/MUN/Block 20 (Kapyemit)/706b.Eldoret/MUN/Block 20 (Kapyemit)/1869c.That the Respondent through his agents, family members, relatives and/or fiancée be restrained from sending any amorphous messages, threats and other tortuous acts detrimental to the Applicant.d.That costs of this Application be in the cause.

Orders/directions 2. This matter coming up on 18. 7.2025 for directions on the Notice of Motion dated 5th May 2025 before Honourable Justice, R. Nyakundi upon reading the motion and the affidavit ex-parte in the first instance

3. It is hereby ordereda.That the Application is certified as urgentb.That the application be served upon the Respondent within 14 days.c.That this matter is fixed for inter-partes hearing on 24th July 2025 before High Court No.2. d.The issue of conservatory orders be canvassed at the inter-partes forum.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE HONOURABLE COURT THIS 18THDAY OF JULY 2025. ………………………………..R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) Sections 1, 1B, 3A

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Rules Order 51

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Matrimonial Property Act 2013 Sections 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Constitution of Kenya 2010 Article 159

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.