[2019] KEHC 2332 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2332 (KLR)

The court found that after the withdrawal of criminal charges and the applicant's clearance of wrongdoing, there was no legal justification for the police to continue holding the applicant's firearm. The respondents failed to provide any substantive reason for the continued retention of the firearm, especially since...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2332 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kristan Oross Pal; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: National Police Service; Respondent: Inspector General of Police
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 43 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Right to Privacy, Police Powers, Firearms Regulation
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Right to Property Right to Privacy Police Powers Firearms Regulation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kristan Oross Pal

Applicant

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

National Police Service

Respondent

Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the continued retention of the applicant's firearm by the police is lawful after withdrawal of criminal charges.
  2. 2 Whether the firearm should be released to the Kenya Revenue Authority for clearance and compliance.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a conservatory order restraining interference with his yatch.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that after the withdrawal of criminal charges and the applicant's clearance of wrongdoing, there was no legal justification for the police to continue holding the applicant's firearm. The respondents failed to provide any substantive reason for the continued retention of the firearm, especially since the applicant had complied with all legal requirements and the only outstanding issue was procedural compliance with the Kenya Revenue Authority. The court held that the applicant's rights to property and due process would be infringed by further withholding of the firearm. Accordingly, the court ordered the immediate release of the firearm to the Kenya Revenue Authority for...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • A conservatory order is issued restraining the 2nd and 3rd respondents and their agents from interfering in any way with the applicant's yatch (LILITH) pending determination of the petition.
  • The Investigating Officer at Shimoni and the police are directed to surrender the applicant's air gun German Walther Pistol Serial No. PP 17062713 to the Kenya Revenue Authority for clearance and compliance.