[2023] KEHC 21284 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 21284 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant's claim of ill health was not entirely convincing, the delay in obtaining certified copies of the proceedings and judgment was substantiated by the certification date. The court held that the requirement to have certified copies before filing an appeal was reasonable, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 21284 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benard Kubai (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Carlin Kayuyu - Deceased); Respondent: Irene Njeri Nganga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E009 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Delay in Filing, Judgment Delivery, Certified Copies, Costs of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Delay in Filing Judgment Delivery Certified Copies Costs of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Kubai (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Carlin Kayuyu - Deceased)

Applicant

Irene Njeri Nganga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the magistrate's court.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate or excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant's claim of ill health was not entirely convincing, the delay in obtaining certified copies of the proceedings and judgment was substantiated by the certification date. The court held that the requirement to have certified copies before filing an appeal was reasonable, and the three-month delay was not inordinate under the circumstances. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application and granted the applicant leave to appeal within 14 days.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal within the next 14 days.
  • Parties to bear their own costs of the application.