[2021] KECA 279 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 279 (KLR)

The court did not proceed to determine the merits of the application for extension of time or change of advocate, as the applicant, through her advocates, communicated her intention to withdraw the application in its entirety. The court acknowledged the request for withdrawal and directed that the application be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 279 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Njoki Kubai alias Jane Njoki Mayer; Respondent: James Kubai Mathu; Respondent: Housing Finance Co. Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 63 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time and Change of Advocate; Withdrawal Before Hearing
Outcome
Application withdrawn before hearing; no orders as to costs.
Judges
JW Lessit
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Withdrawal of Application, Change of Advocate
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Withdrawal of Application Change of Advocate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Njoki Kubai alias Jane Njoki Mayer

Applicant

James Kubai Mathu

Respondent

Housing Finance Co. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time and Change of Advocate; Withdrawal Before Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to extend time to file and serve the notice and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave for a change of advocate after judgment.
  3. 3 Whether the application should be withdrawn as requested by the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court did not proceed to determine the merits of the application for extension of time or change of advocate, as the applicant, through her advocates, communicated her intention to withdraw the application in its entirety. The court acknowledged the request for withdrawal and directed that the application be returned to the registry for further action upon formal withdrawal by the applicant. No orders as to costs were made, and the matter was taken out of the day's cause list. The ruling thus turned on the applicant's right to withdraw her application before determination, subject to compliance with procedural requirements.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn before hearing; no orders as to costs.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 24th August 2020 is returned to the registry for dates once the applicant formally applies to withdraw her application.
  • No orders as to costs.