[2019] KEELRC 1343 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1343 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant received the conciliator's report on 15th June, 2009, and the claim was filed on 9th October, 2012, which was beyond the limitation period set by section 90 of the Employment Act. The claimant failed to file any affidavit or documentation to support the assertion that the delay was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1343 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: KUDHEIHA Workers; Respondent: BOG Lenana School
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 645 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim struck out as statute barred
Judges
DI Wasike
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Employment Act Section 90, Conciliation Process, Statutory Bar, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation of Actions Employment Act Section 90 Conciliation Process Statutory Bar Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KUDHEIHA Workers

Claimant

BOG Lenana School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's suit is statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in conciliation can extend the limitation period for filing the claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant received the conciliator's report on 15th June, 2009, and the claim was filed on 9th October, 2012, which was beyond the limitation period set by section 90 of the Employment Act. The claimant failed to file any affidavit or documentation to support the assertion that the delay was due to the conciliation process. Therefore, the suit was statute barred and could not be sustained.

Court Disposition

claim struck out as statute barred

Orders

  • The claim is struck out for being statute barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  • No order as to costs.