[2024] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his prolonged inaction over five years and repeated non-attendance at court. The Claimant's last-minute instruction of advocates and lack of awareness of the hearing date did not constitute sufficient cause to set aside the dismissal....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Phillip Munyithia Kumanda; Respondent: Metro Consultants & Guardian Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 985 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- application to set aside dismissal declined; claim remains dismissed; costs to respondent; file closed
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Reinstatement of Claim, Delay in Prosecution, Court Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phillip Munyithia Kumanda
Applicant
Metro Consultants & Guardian Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant has provided sufficient reason for failure to prosecute the claim for five years.
- 2 Whether the court should set aside the dismissal order and reinstate the claim.
- 3 Whether the Respondent is entitled to closure of the matter after prolonged inactivity by the Claimant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his prolonged inaction over five years and repeated non-attendance at court. The Claimant's last-minute instruction of advocates and lack of awareness of the hearing date did not constitute sufficient cause to set aside the dismissal. The court emphasized the Respondent's right to closure after six years of litigation and held that there was no justification for reinstatement. Accordingly, the application to set aside the dismissal was declined, costs awarded to the Respondent, and the file ordered closed.
Court Disposition
application to set aside dismissal declined; claim remains dismissed; costs to respondent; file closed
Orders
- The application filed by the Claimant dated 23rd November 2023 is declined.
- Costs to the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kumanda v Metro Consultants & Guardian Limited (Cause 985 of 2018) [2024] KEELRC 1455 (KLR) (14 June 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 985 of 2018
J Rika, J
June 14, 2024
Between
Phillip Munyithia Kumanda
Claimant
and
Metro Consultants & Guardian Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. This Claim was dismissed for want of prosecution on 16th November 2023, upon an application filed by the Respondent, dated 20th June 2023.
2. The Court was persuaded by the submission made by the Respondent that, the Claim was filed on 18th June 2018; the Statement of Response was filed on 11th July 2018; the Reply to the Statement of Response was filed on 26th September 2018; and hearing scheduled for 17th December 2018.
3. The Claimant was absent on the hearing date, and rather than dismiss the Claim for non-attendance, the Court directed that a fresh hearing date be obtained at the Registry.
4. From then, there was no action taken by the Claimant to prosecute the Claim.
5. The Respondent filed its application dated 20th June 2023 for dismissal for want of prosecution.
6. The Claimant was served with the application but again did not attend Court, for hearing of the application, on 16th November 2023. The application was allowed in his absence.
7. He has filed an application dated 23rd November 2023, seeking setting aside of the orders of dismissal, made on 16th November 2023.
8. He argues, through his affidavit sworn on 23rd November 2023, that the Court ought to extend substantive justice to him, by reinstating his Claim, and hearing the Parties on merit. He instructed a firm of Advocates to represent him on the eve of the hearing of the application, the 15th November 2023. He was not aware that the application was due for hearing on 16th November 2023. His Advocates were not aware.
9. The Respondent urges the Court not to revisit the orders of 16th November 2023, relying of grounds of opposition, dated 5th February 2024. Its position is that the Claimant has not explained why he did not take any steps to prosecute the Claim for 5 years. He was served with the application for dismissal of the Claim for want of prosecution. He did nothing, other than instruct Advocates to act for him, on the eve of the hearing.
10. Parties agreed to argue the application through written submissions, which they confirmed to have filed and exchanged, at the last appearance before the Court, on 28th February 2024.
The Court Finds : - 11. The Claimant has not explained satisfactorily why he did not prosecute his Claim for 5 years, and why he did not attend Court when the Respondent moved the Court to dismiss the Claim for want of prosecution. The record is replete with instances of the Claimant failing to attend Court, be it on hearing of the Claim, applications or mentions. Even when the Parties were moved by the Court to attend Court, the Claimant kept his distance. He showed no desire at all, to prosecute the Claim. The Respondent is entitled to closure, 6 years after it was hauled before the Court by the Claimant. There is no reason given by the Claimant, to justify re-instatement of the Claim.It is ordered:a.The application filed by the Claimant dated 23rd November 2023 is declined.b.Costs to the Respondent.c.The file is closed as ordered on 16th November 2023.
DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES ELECTRONICALLY AT NAIROBI, UNDER PRACTICE DIRECTION 6[2] OF THE ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS, 2020, THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2024. JAMES RIKAJUDGE