[2024] KEELC 13359 (KLR)
The court held that the application to strike out the suit was not merited because the trial was already underway, with the re-examination of PW1 ongoing. The court emphasized that issues relating to the merits or demerits of the case, including questions of ownership and proprietary rights, should be determined at...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 13359 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: James Ng’ang’a Kung’u; Plaintiff: Myra Wanjiru Kung’u Sadiq alias Monica Wanjiru Kung’u; Defendant: Kibagare Slums Association (Sued Through Abdi Godana Dida & David M. Nyaga, its Officials and Trustees); Respondent: National Land Commission
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 64 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit
- Outcome
- Application to strike out the suit dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Suit, Proprietary Rights, Interlocutory Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Ng’ang’a Kung’u
Plaintiff
Myra Wanjiru Kung’u Sadiq alias Monica Wanjiru Kung’u
Plaintiff
Kibagare Slums Association (Sued Through Abdi Godana Dida & David M. Nyaga, its Officials and Trustees)
Defendant
National Land Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have locus standi to maintain the suit over the suit land.
- 2 Whether the defendant's application to strike out the suit is merited at the interlocutory stage.
- 3 Whether issues of ownership and proprietary rights should be determined at the main hearing or at the interlocutory stage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application to strike out the suit was not merited because the trial was already underway, with the re-examination of PW1 ongoing. The court emphasized that issues relating to the merits or demerits of the case, including questions of ownership and proprietary rights, should be determined at the main hearing and not at the interlocutory stage. The court relied on constitutional principles of justice and the right to be heard, as well as relevant case law, to conclude that striking out the suit at this stage would be premature and contrary to the interests of substantive justice.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out the suit dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.
Orders
- The defendant's Notice of Motion application dated 29.4.2024 is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kung’u & another (As Administrators of the Estate of Cosmas Kungu Muhinja - Deceased) v Kibagare Slums Association (Sued Through Abdi Godana Dida & David M. Nyaga, its Officials and Trustees); National Land Commission (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 64 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 13359 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13359 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case 64 of 2020
LN Mbugua, J
November 14, 2024
Between
James Ng’ang’a Kung’u
1st Plaintiff
Myra Wanjiru Kung’u Sadiq alias Monica Wanjiru Kung’u
2nd Plaintiff
As Administrators of the Estate of Cosmas Kungu Muhinja - Deceased
and
Kibagare Slums Association (Sued Through Abdi Godana Dida & David M. Nyaga, its Officials and Trustees)
Defendant
and
National Land Commission
Interested Party
Ruling
1. Before me is the defendant’s Notice of Motion application dated 29. 4.2024 seeking orders to strike out the suit. The application is premised on the grounds on the face of the application and the supporting affidavit of John Mwangi, the chairman of the defendant. They contend that the plaintiffs are not the owners of the suit land which still belongs to the Kenya railways.
2. The plaintiffs oppose the application vide their replying affidavit dated 1. 7.2024 sworn by James Nganga Kungu one of the administrators of the estate of Cosmas Kungu. He contends that the application is premature and a waste of court’s precious time as the survey report by National Land Commission did not in any way confer proprietary rights and or possession of the suit property upon the defendants. Adding that the suit is partly heard where PW1 has given his testimony and is yet to be stood down.
3. I have considered all the arguments proffered herein. In John Nahashon Mwangi v Kenya Finance Bank Limited (in Liquidation) [2015] eKLR Justice Gikonyo held that;“The fundamental principles of justice are enshrined in the entire Constitution and specifically in Article 159 of the Constitution. Article 50 coupled with article 159 of the Constitution on right to be heard and the constitutional desire to serve substantive justice to all the parties, respectively, constitutes the defined principles which should guide the court in making a decision on such matter of reinstatement of a suit which has been dismissed by the court…..”
4. It is the finding of this court that the same principles would apply in a question of whether a suit should be sustained or struck out. The trial herein is mid stream, where the re-examination of PW1 is underway. Any issues relating to the merits or demerits of the case ought to be ventilated in the main hearing and not in interlocutory applications.
5. In the end, I find that the application dated 29. 4.2024 is not merited, the same is hereby dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 14thDAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:Kimiti for PlaintiffWaigwa for DefendantNjuguna for Interested PartyCourt Assistant: Vena