[2023] KECPT 818 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was a member of the Respondent Sacco and had contributed Kshs 432,310/=. The Respondent did not dispute the amount or the Claimant's membership but relied on AGM resolutions to delay payment. The Tribunal held that the law entitles a member to a refund upon withdrawal, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KECPT 818 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucy Wanjiru Kuria; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Society Ltd
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 45/E047 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in full for the Claimant.
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Cooperative Societies, Member Withdrawal, Refund of Contributions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucy Wanjiru Kuria
Applicant
Metropolitan National Sacco Society Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her contributions upon withdrawal from the Respondent Sacco.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was a member of the Respondent Sacco and had contributed Kshs 432,310/=. The Respondent did not dispute the amount or the Claimant's membership but relied on AGM resolutions to delay payment. The Tribunal held that the law entitles a member to a refund upon withdrawal, and internal resolutions or liquidity challenges do not override statutory entitlements. The Claimant had no liabilities, and the Respondent's reasons for withholding the refund were insufficient. Therefore, the Claimant was entitled to the full refund, plus costs and interest.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in full for the Claimant.
Orders
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 432,310/=.
- The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Kuria v Metropolitan National Sacco Society Ltd (Tribunal Case 45/E047 of 2022) [2023] KECPT 818 (KLR) (31 August 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KECPT 818 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 45/E047 of 2022
BM Kimemia, Chair, J. Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw & PO Aol, Members
August 31, 2023
Between
Lucy Wanjiru Kuria
Claimant
and
Metropolitan National Sacco Society Ltd
Respondent
Judgment
1. The claim for determination dated 03/02/2022 filed on 15/02/2022. The Claimant avers that on 09/07/2020 she withdrew her membership from the Respondent and sought for a refund of her contribution of Kshs. 432,310/=. She filed her Witness Statement dated 03/02/2020 and filed on 15/02/2020 and a Withdrawal Letter dated 09/07/2020
2. The Respondent filed a statement of defense dated 21/03/2022 on 22/03/2022. The Respondent denies the claim by the Claimant. The Respondent avers that they did not receive any Withdrawal Notice from the Claimant. However, the Respondent avers that the Claimant’s refund was scheduled for payment on 19/07/2022 as per Annual General Meeting Resolutions of 2019, which according to the Respondent are binding to the Claimant.
3. The Respondent filed a witness statement by David Muhoro dated 21/03/2022 on 21/03/2022. The Respondent also filed a list of documents dated 21/03/2022 on 22/03/2022, which included;a.Claimant’s member statement.b.SACCO by-lawsc.2019 Annual General Meeting Resolutions.
4. The Claimant filed her submission dated 19/01/2023 on 19/01/2023 The Respondent did not file any submissions.Having considered the pleadings and written submissions by both parties the issue for determination is one:
Issues for determination. Whether the Claimant is entitled to their refund. 5. It is not disputed by the Respondent that the Claimant was their member and held savings and contributions amounting to Kshs 432,310/=. The only reason the Respondent are not refunding the Claimant is because of the Annual General Meeting Resolutions of 2019 requiring the refund to be scheduled. The Claimant’s refund was consequently scheduled for 19th July 2022.
6. TheCooperative Society Act read together with the Cooperative Societies Rules of 2004 requires that members are entitled to refunds upon expulsion or withdrawal of membership.
7. The Respondent produced the Claimant’s Statement of Accounts clearly indicated that the Claimant has no liabilities preventing payments of the refunds. The liquidity issues and challenges are not reason enough to deny the Claimant her refund.
Determination. 8. The Claimant has proved their case and we thus find in favor of the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs 432,310/= plus costs and interest.
JUDGMENT SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023. HON. BEATRICE KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. BEATRICE SAWE MEMBER SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA MEMBER SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. PHILIP GICHUKI MEMBER SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW MEMBER SIGNED 31. 8.2023HON. PAUL AOL MEMBER SIGNED 31. 8.2023TRIBUNAL CLERK JEMIMAHHON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 31. 8.2023