[2017] KEELRC 1553 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1553 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated by the respondent without notice or valid cause, in violation of the Employment Act 2007. The respondent failed to file any response or attend court, leaving the claimant's evidence unchallenged. The court accepted the claimant's account of his employment...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1553 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kuroh Baraks Wamae; Respondent: China CAMC Engineering Co. Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 498 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; judgment for the claimant.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Overtime Pay, Annual Leave Entitlement, Public Holiday Pay, Rest Days, Salary Arrears
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Overtime Pay Annual Leave Entitlement Public Holiday Pay Rest Days Salary Arrears

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kuroh Baraks Wamae

Claimant

China CAMC Engineering Co. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly and unlawfully terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid salary, overtime, annual leave, public holiday pay, rest days, notice pay, and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to a certificate of service and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated by the respondent without notice or valid cause, in violation of the Employment Act 2007. The respondent failed to file any response or attend court, leaving the claimant's evidence unchallenged. The court accepted the claimant's account of his employment terms, hours worked, and the circumstances of his termination. The court held that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary, overtime pay, annual leave, public holiday pay, rest days, one month’s salary in lieu of notice, and compensation for unfair termination equivalent to six months’ salary. The claims for gratuity and proof of NSSF/NHIF contributions were rejected due to...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • Declaration that termination was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay claimant arrears of salary at Kshs. 216,000.