[2020] KEHC 4126 (KLR)
The court found that it was functus officio, having already determined the applicant's appeal against conviction and sentence, and thus lacked jurisdiction to entertain a further application for review of sentence. Additionally, the court established from the lower court record that the applicant had been released...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 4126 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kyalo Kioko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 54 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- BC Koech
- Legal Topics
- Defilement Offence, Sentencing Review, Functus Officio, Time Spent in Custody, Sexual Offences Act, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kyalo Kioko
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the applicant's sentence after an appeal has been determined and not appealed further.
- 2 Whether the period spent in custody by the applicant should be considered in sentencing under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that it was functus officio, having already determined the applicant's appeal against conviction and sentence, and thus lacked jurisdiction to entertain a further application for review of sentence. Additionally, the court established from the lower court record that the applicant had been released on cash bail and was not in custody during the trial, making his claim for consideration of time spent in custody meritless. Consequently, the application for review of sentence was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The applicant's application filed on 5.6.2020 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MACHAKOS
Coram: D. K. Kemei – J
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPL. NO. 54 OF 2020
KYALO KIOKO........................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Kyalo Kioko, the Applicant herein was charged with defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(4) of the Sexual Offences Act.
2. The Applicant was taken through a full trial and was subsequently convicted and sentenced to serve 15 years imprisonment.
3. The Applicant was aggrieved by the conviction and sentence and filed an appeal to the High Court wherein the conviction and sentence was upheld.
4. The Applicant did not appeal against the decision of the High Court to the Court of Appeal. He opted to file a new application before this court in which he seeks review of sentence pursuant to the decision in Evans Wanjala Wanyonyi (2019) eKLR. He also sought that the time he served in custody be considered pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. From the import of the functus officio doctrine the applicant is not entitled to resentencing. The applicant has sought to have the period spent in custody to be considered. Well, under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code such period ought to be taken into account. However, the lower court record reveals that the applicant was released on a cash bail of Kshs 30,000 and remained on bond until his conviction and sentence when the said cash bail was ordered to be refunded to the depositor. Hence the applicant is not sincere when he alleges that he had remained in custody throughout the trial when the record reveals otherwise. That being the position, the applicant’s claim lacks merit. Due to the hierarchy of the courts and the appeal system, this court is already functus officio and hence the applicant is best advised to proceed to the Court of Appeal for redress if need be.
5. In the result it is my finding that the applicant’s application filed on 5. 6.2020 lacks merit and is dismissed.
Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 20th day of July 2020.
D. K. Kemei
Judge